Laserfiche WebLink
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />I'.ichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />February 10, 1987 <br />Subject: #1108 James & Mary Ann McGowan, 3175 Jamestown Road - <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing <br />Application: Divide 5.2 acre lot into 2 lots of 2-plus acres each. <br />Zoning District; RR-lB 2-acre unsewered <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Pertinent Facts: <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey <br />Survey With Staff Notes <br />I <br />Lot A - 3.19 Acres <br />Lot B - 2.01 Acres (see Item II below) <br />I. (See Exhibit E) A drainageway cuts across the eastern corner of <br />the property. This is a gully draining approximately 10-15 acres of <br />land, and leads to a 30" culvert under Jamestown Road. Staff feels <br />that a 20* wide drainage easement should be taken over this <br />drainageway. <br />II. The drainageway does have the effect of creating a parcel of non­ <br />contiguous dry-buiIdable land, and makes the proposed lot less than 2 <br />acres contiguous. The proposed dividing line must be relocated to <br />keep 2 contiguous dry acres in the proposed lot. <br />Accomplishing the above will require an even more "contrived" lot <br />arrangement than that proposed. The existing house and septic system <br />were not placed on the lot by the original builder with the intent to <br />do a future subdivision. <br />III. Lot "A" as proposed requires a variance to lot width at the 50* <br />setback line (approximately 108* width proposed, 200* required. <br />IV. Both Lots A and B require a variance for frontage only on a <br />private road. <br />V. Sepr.ic testing has not been submitted as of this writing. Staff <br />notes that test holes were found on Lot B during a site inspection on <br />2/10/87, but none noted on Lot A for an alternate site. <br />Given the above facts, staff would recommend holding the public <br />hearing, then tabling until the following have been submitted and reviewed <br />by staff: