Laserfiche WebLink
mA Kumlin's plat of Foxwood should be at least considered. This could be accomplished by taking a 25' strip either side of the line b^ween the two plats. This would not be a problem for Lot <br />2 Block 1 of Ranie Anderson plat, but would cause lot area <br />Kumlin, who is coming in for final plat approvalShortly. <br />III. Septic Concerns. We have not received septic testing <br />reports for any of the properties. Lot 2 Block 1 was apparently <br />tested last fall, given the test hole locations shown on the <br />survey. We wi 11 require testing on Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and also <br />for an alternate site for the existing house. Lot 2 Block 2 will <br />testing at this time because it exceeds 5 acres dry <br />buildable and is likely to be further subdivided in the future. <br />IV. Wetlands. Conservation and Flowage easements will be <br />required over the two major wetlands on the property. We would <br />also recommend consideration of requiring a Conservation and <br />Flowage easement over the lew area along the northwest end of <br />Lot 2 Block 2. <br />V. Drainage. The drainage easement shown in Lots 1 and 2 Block <br />1 is appropriate. The drainage and utility easement along the <br />east line of Out lot C should be widened to 20' and <br />10 respectively. All outside permiter lot line drainage and <br />utility easements should be expanded to 10' in width. <br />VI. Outlot C. Must remain under ownership of the Homeowners <br />Association as an unbuildable Outlot, may be sold only for <br />combination with neighbor to the immediate south (740 Old Crystal <br />Bay Road) or maybe should be made a part of Lot 1 Block 2. . . <br />the point is to avoid it becoming somebody's idea of a building <br />site. ^ <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />A. Issues needing more input before final decisions and <br />recommendations can be made: <br />1. ) County Road access location <br />2. ) Septic testing <br />B. Issues for Planning Commission to address on a conceptual <br />basis for this proposal: <br />1. ) "Staging** of road development <br />2. ) Whether or not a corridor for future access to the <br />north is appropriate <br />3. ) Consideration whether low land northeast of existing <br />house should be a designated wetland to be consistent <br />with other projects, given that it's a pothole <br />(surveyor: which way does it flow? what are its <br />boundaries?); also considering the north end of that <br />.. r