Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1144 <br />May 13, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />6. A Conservation & Flowage Easement should be required over the wetlands <br />on the property. <br />Staff Recomnendation - <br />Staff recommends approval as follows: <br />1. Plat to be revised as shown in Exhibit "E". <br />2. Setbacks per Exhibit E. <br />3. Road & Utilities Easement to be granted over future private/public <br />road Outlot A. <br />4. Conservation & Flowage Easement to be granted over wetlands on west <br />half of property. <br />5. Standard drainage and utilities easements along property <br />boundaries to be shown on the plat. <br />6. Payment of park fee of $400 ($200 for each new lot between 2.0 and <br />4.99 acres). <br />7. Granting of the appropriate standard variances for Lots 1 and 2 <br />for: <br />a) Lot width at 50' setback from cul-de-sac (200* required; Lot <br />1 has 125', Lot 2 has 75'). <br />b) Lack of frontage on public roadway. <br />Addendum - <br />Planning Commission may wish to address the timing of future <br />improvements to the outlot on the Boyke and Cragg plats. Consider that if <br />the two plats had come to us as one application, we would likely have <br />required development of the road and cul-de-sac, but given -he existing <br />private development of "Lydiard Road" as a gravel road on a narrow private <br />easement, when might it be appropriate to upgrade that road or portions of <br />it?