Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1128 <br />May 14, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />for the posted speed limit, sraii technically <br />ramifications regardless f°' V®’action; ifapprove it and <br />acceptable ® to^°^cessive speed and the City was aware of a <br />there is an accident i<ahilitv'^ Staff suggests these concerns <br />r?.s“Si i.r.Ei%*«p... <br />approval. <br />A third option to consider i=J°«Yirto‘’\urwi\rnot%h^^^^^^ ?he <br />foft'afiSL‘roin?!"%\7s UK^^^thafa^^\°e a\“e%''ievelops, the County <br />will eventually flatten the grade here. <br />The City would be ^®gTo^ck^ 1^ necess^^rily because <br />dedication along the supported the County'sthe county requested it (the City .^as historical <br />requested 80' -°^o/ds'' as County Road 84 is designated in"scenic parkw..ys" or "collector ^oa6s as ^ <br />the Community Management Plan), but to accoir.nioaa <br />future grade lowering. <br />C, Future Access to the North <br />Dennis Kumlin, who is completing ® wiU <br />proposed plat, has noted that a of his property as well <br />have a highly detrimental effect is definitely opposed to <br />as the value and security of ‘•''® he%e^ P^*"^ <br />Ip;^ovanrrradyr^'’F\'^om“VUurtt"^^ a through road would allow <br />for added police protection of the area. <br />Staff sees two benefits to having the road connected: <br />1. Emergency response time frcm points -st could be reduced as much <br />as 30-60 seconds; this seems to be a minor benefit. <br />2. If the City was to take onV “ througlT" roTd^*/a'ther thanbe more efficient to maintain them as one cnrougn <br />two cul-de-sacs. <br />Any dedication of >^i?ht-of-way from KumllnU plat “^Sn*^the*other <br />%\\?ng"rn'enrir: 5^co%“r/do; from°”t 2,"VlocK 1, will leave it at or <br />slightly below 4 dry acres, causing future subdivision problems.