Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1149 <br />May 13, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Review of Original Proposal - Application 1846 - Approved 10/15/84 <br />Review Exhibit E, the invert elevation to proposed pond is shown at <br />99‘ or 1 foot lower than outflow elevation of existing pond on Lot 2. <br />Applicant should confirm the 1 foot drop in elevation can be Y <br />the existing drainage tile (under shared drive) draining to east s^e of <br />Lot 3. The overflow elevation from the proposed pond is also at the 9 9 <br />elevation. The overflow drainage will be transmitted <br />grassed swale area to the drainage ditch along County Road 6. <br />llear’ from the approved plans of 1984 and existing =°"<*ttions in the field <br />lust how drainage will entrance or leave the pond. <br />ipplicanfs contractor should amend plans to include more detailed <br />information for these specific functions at the time of filing for land <br />alteration permit. <br />The pond will be of the same design as the one <^ <br />with a maximum depth of 5 feet and 4:1 side slopes provided on one side of <br />the pond. <br />The overflow (at the approved elevation of 1031') will not impact the <br />septic systems on either property nor will it create problems <br />surrounding properties. <br />The resolution approving the original conditional <br />I) is enclosed for your consideration. The findings can still be made and <br />except for the granting of a conservation and flowage easement over the <br />pond area, all other conditions remain appropriate. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />To approve the renewed conditional use permit application Scott <br />Vic)ce?m?/subject to the findings and conditions <br />requirement of a conservation and flowage easement) set forth in the <br />resolution (No. 1685) approving the original oonditional use.