Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Pile #1106 <br />February 12, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Discussion: <br />aaait"iona ove/m^ny yVars'hVve tlsuJted i*/hiah”"® Piaaeteel <br />1 % P^^ctic^iXy no h^irdcovoir m f^r"c24- iin# ^ . , <br />To...,rV^ owners a great hardship, hence we don't see the safl:.^v issue as a valid reason for excessive harrlr-ntro*- ai ^ <br />portion (about 1/4) of the 7S-?ro®VAa f ® ^reat <br />Plastic may hav\ llttJractual effect ''' <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />EEuSftr£ "'EHS';““ <br />;e%%"rit.r irs,*:,-A.Ye‘ <br />rather wan®ouLardV® ‘’V building upward <br />the lake encroached to a Significant degree by the addition? <br />what portions of existing hardcover can be reinoved to <br />compensate for the additions? <br />from \\%V hardcover variances approved <br />Drive?°56 /% ^“00:^^ ^^T'PeVers^®"3590°"Nt'rth' ShoJe <br />T—^^stricted. The othc^r notable cases where <br />excessive hardcover has been allowed in the 0-75' zone in nearlv <br />Wro^^ov'^er® *’®® “ tradeoff of pre-existWn <br />cover* ®tt“°tio"' staff would suggest that a hard- <br />hardcoler wlthout''®t7,H'’^5f‘^'"*®’'f:. ®“°"a"<=e of additionalapprovals! tradeoff would be inconsistent with past