Laserfiche WebLink
'it <br />‘'i <br />r <br />V i <br />Zoning File #1090 <br />November 11, 1986 <br />Page 2 <br />II. Issues Unresolved From Previous Subdivision Approvals <br />A. Garage on proposed Lot 2: <br />from Iht detached garage on what is now proposed Lot 2 was to be removed <br />app^^val Pnti condition of original subdivision <br />in^iclte this has never bren'’donr °''" conducted in 1979, 1980 and 1986 <br />B. Access driveway to County Road 6; <br />r-rb ^^7 access driveway serving the residences on proposed Lot 1 was to be <br />removed and regraded to eliminate any direct acceL off of cLnty load e! <br />Roar but^Te >^®sidences from Hollanderdriveway was never removed and today is still used as a primary access from County Road 6. usea as a <br />C. Road outlot ownership; <br />take ^ 1^f persisted in trying to have the City <br />he^^nKT® Hollander Road as a public road. The City never intended it to <br />• 1^1 steadfastly refused to accept the road as public. You <br />with Hilffur^P^ listed Orono as "taxpayer" on the road outlotith Hildur P. Hollander as owner (see property owners list). The City has <br />been doing battle with Hennepin County over this for at least 3-4 years. <br />Hollander never filed the paperwork to create a Homeowner's <br />Association to maintain the road. Now, the existing homeowners served by <br />Hollander Road are not in unanimous agreement regarding a Homeowner's <br />Association, hence maintenance and ownership of the road is a potential on­going problem. ^ <br />III. Issues and Facts Regarding Proposed Lots: <br />A. Lot 1 <br />system and well on Lot 1 are approximately as shown on <br />Exhibit E. Soil testing to find an alternate site for the large house <br />has commenced but no report as of this writing. Note that driveway <br />might be over the existing drainfield, but it is functioning <br />adequately. The small rental house has a septic system, but no well <br />to staff's knowledge. <br />2. The main residence meets the required 30' side setbacks and other <br />required setbacks from proposed property lines. <br />3. The proposed Lot 1 requires a variance to lot width as measured at <br />the 50' setback from County Road 6 (186.90' where 200' is required), <br />but meets the lot width requirement as measured based on the private <br />road being the front yard.