My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1987 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1987
>
01-20-1987 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2023 11:52:34 AM
Creation date
12/27/2023 11:46:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE PIJINNIKG COMMISSION MEETING NEED NOVEHEEIi 17, 1986 <br />(^1090 UOLLANDEn CONTINUED <br />concTrL''^.-Vnnlf‘'’E®'’ ^hat ho felt Some of the numerous " ■'hould be resolved before the Planning <br />Commission could make a recommendation. <br />was ^unc\eW‘."^'^ intentions of the proposed lots <br />Mr. Rurik stated that they plan to comply with the <br />removing the garage on Lot 2 <br />?• ? driveway. He noted that a <br />covenants has been filed so a Homeowners <br />?h« n® ^^cessary (he will forward a copy to <br />the City . Regarding the rental house, they would like <br />to keep It as a guest house. <br />asked if they would be willing to incur <br />testing and placement of new <br />septic if needed to comply with guest house standards. <br />dol/noi^ testing is being done now and <br />oes not want to make any committment until the results <br />are available. Regarding the barns, they would be <br />willing to give up the use by animals, but are opposed <br />tL stated he would like to confer with <br />the City Attorney regarding the issue of the barns being <br />non-conforming structures. He further stated that the <br />reason subdivision is being pursued at this time is due <br />of Mrs. Hollander's Will that Lot 1 <br />(which IS currently for sale) be given to Hollander's <br />daughters, and Lot 2 be given to John Hollander. F® <br />noted that the existence of the barns, which some fe * - <br />IS an eyesore, is unrelated to the subdivision reques.' <br />Public Comments - <br />Steve Weinstein, 250 Hollander Rd.- Speaking on behalf <br />c£ the Holly Acres Homeowners Association, they are <br />unanimously against the proposed subdivision for the <br />following reasons; <br />1. Lot 1 does not conform with the 2 acre zoning <br />code, and they feel the rental house should be removed. <br />2. To their knowledge, Mrs. Hollander filed oapers <br />assuring them that before the lots would be <br />subdivided, all existing buildings v/ould be razed. <br />3. Existing barns are a safety hazard. <br />4. Existing well v;ater may be contaminated. <br />Brian Hill, 235 Hollander Rd. - He stated that the <br />house is an eyesore and that there is a constant <br />problem with junk cars on the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.