Laserfiche WebLink
’-V <br />M <br />Zoning File #1980 <br />October 16, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Review of Application: <br />conceptual%/rVctTon^wasTivln°t^ September 15, 198-= <br />^ rezoning app?icatio^n^^ in advising them to <br />was thought that the applicants shorn rf V-i»- V ^ earlier discussion, it <br />from the Council in light of the ma-ior^l^^^^ conceptual direction <br />P^®P®ration of a multi nh;^c£»/? -» i • expenses involved in th#» <br />conditional use permit). ADo/ic;^T^^ (J^zoning, subdivision and <br />applications invol ving * the RR-lA 7 advised that in rezoning <br />consistently sought the incut the Cify halzone before taking anv cosltHon ^ residents of the 5-acre rural <br />zoning district exists because thl> ^ rezoning application. Ths RP-ia <br />retain the ambiance of the laro<a =0^residents wish to <br />neighborhood. “ ^obby farm - low density <br />ad3ace\\" ?o"%^ b^^^n^d\%M ^P-P-ty <br />group. The application involved the former qwf Development <br />rezoning sought a change from RR-IA to rT-^ n - p Properties - the <br />denied and the propertv devf>lr> 2-acres minimum,at the one unit per 5-acre density. ^ ^ developed under the PRD made <br />•jijin ents on petition for rezoning; <br />owners who\ct°i^v”el^y^ seek^ tuyer of the Miner <br />John Burger. Hazel Anderson r! rezoning are Andrew Miner and <br />adjacent property owners whose properties'^a^e James Maus are the <br />be rezoned. Please review Exhibit^ n included in the areas to <br />of existing residences. Note per SectFcn location <br />the vagueness of this P lO.lOr Subdivision 2 (3) - <br />petition. standard would suggest we have received /valid <br />Please note Exhibits II I & p 4-k r** <br />and show Gardiner's .39 acre croAoK<-^, "*®P^ incorrect <br />Gardiner's property is alrt^ariv^i include i in the RR-lA zone <br />will verify the records but it a°ppears”that'’th*''*'^* *°"®' <br />Maus property is also included^ the^R^ A ’ '^'’e <br />complete a rezoning of that cnr.-< Burger was to <br />subdivision application but it i^s no^t c/° his 1977 <br />currently available to staff if that ha° beercC^lTtedT <br />General Pacts: <br />Approximate Total Area - 41.1 acres iO 'i <br />Approximate Dry Area - 23.5 acres <br />Amended Dry Area - 25.2 acres <br />Approximate Wet Area - 17.6 acres <br />Amended Wet Area = 15.9 acres