Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br />Zoning File #988 <br />December 3, 1985 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />• ^ «« i/nr-iances to the hardcover limita- <br />3. The applicant is ^ 25% limitation. Note that the <br />tion, and feels he ^^^Itted ^ <br />previous applicant 40% \frdcovet, but was never 'rollowed up. Note <br />showed aPPboxi'’aP®^y have to be fairly <br />flo\e^to°thrroad“and/or the existing garage will have to be used. <br />4. The existing garage is n°n-con£orming in/h-^,tture"|anfA\“in <br />Within the If the applicant was forced to remove <br />rht%rreto a^slA^^ore <br />5. NO setback variances are requested for the new construction. <br />6. City water is in P*'® ^“J^atA^lines^were^Asta^ it was <br />property, since at the time C y ^ 5590 water unit charge <br />rsAfe"pird!^ln^d’’the^lU?t,lA%e Aetp°^ -r the connection to <br />the City line. <br />7. City sewer is available on the ..TTl <br />ever, the stub on Lot 18 was u^ed ^ ^ anticipating that Lot <br />according to City A^new^^stub a^nd connection would have to be <br />18 would become ^ -.-o that the sewer unit charge for Lot <br />?r:Alfbc^A:sr?ir25 AnlAarunlt charge, .les^ <br />e^Arbe*°Ac';fa-seV tl°SV"ii "pA per.it is not applied for by <br />December 31, 1985.) <br />The applicant has not provided a P-posed site plan, but is aware of <br />the hardcover and setback limiiations of the lo . <br />findings <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 988. <br />4.^ -ic; located in the LR-IC Single Family La)ceshore The property is locatec m <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The property was i^^^XoTgh'^rgVv^wre?thTc'urrent owner? Douglas <br />•fpr-I