Laserfiche WebLink
T-' <br />ki <br />^%\'i <br />;«rJ; <br />^r'N' <br />f\ <br />.» <br />iL <br />•A <br />Jk ^ <br />'Ji' i ^ <br />'V ^- * -a^iff'?? <br />,V tS: <br />s«i'- ^'' ■ ar."'V'i <br />• )/■■ <br />£^-^r1d <br />|t - *»'.*? <br />^->1 <br />>i4«1 <br />, ^1 ‘fv: f -s«^': Jg <br />• ^S'< <br />. I - *- <br />..1 <br />."in;:ip fe_-'iv'A-•■■; ‘ • A\ •■• '/: 'm •p^* * • ^ <br />Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Front Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Datet November 9, 1988 <br />Subjectt #1354 Robert & Margaret Merkow/John & Phyliss Charlton, <br />2340 & 2380 Abingdon Way - <br />Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing <br />Application - Revise lot line between two properties. <br />Zoning District - RR-IB <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey <br />Pertinent Facts - <br />1. Each existing lot exceeds 2.0 acres in area. The proposed realignment <br />of the lot line will result in a slight increase (.02 acre) in the <br />property at 2360, and an equivalent decrease in the property at 2340. <br />2.The reasons for the proposed rearrangement include expansion of the <br />Merkow front yard, as well as allowing their driveway to be located <br />further west. <br />Existing and future drainfield sites are not affected by this <br />rearrangement. <br />Discussion - <br />This is a simple lot line rearrangement, and would appear to be <br />reasonable and of benefit to both property owners. Staff finds no problems <br />with the proposed realignment. Note that the new line will not line up <br />with the existing drainage and utility easements. It is the applicants' <br />intent to grant new drainage and utility easements over the new line, and <br />as of this writing, applicants* surveyor notes that it is their intent to <br />proceed with a vacation of the existing drains^e and utility easement. The <br />surveyor also notes that there are apparently no existing utilities that <br />would be affected by this move. <br />Since the issue of easement vacation was not t>rojght up until after <br />the subdivision application was filed and notice ji-jb• ished, the vacation <br />will be the subject of a subsequent application, for review at your next <br />meeting. <br />Staff Recomendation - <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement, <br />subject to granting of new drainage and utility easements over the new <br />dividing line, with the intent that the existing easements will eventually <br />be vacated. <br />r <br />«:'• ■* <br />X-v ■ = ”m II <br />r <br />XT OF ORONO - £ <br />ROPERTT LOCATIOV <br />2 7 <br />Lte Address <br />roperty Identifi <br />lease check one <br />:tach legal des <br />■r" <br /># <br />PPUCABT <br />Name kJOH^ <br />Z3- <br />Address: <br />DNNER (if differ* <br />OlH ) <br />Name _ __ <br />Address: _ <br />(attach lii <br />EXISTING LAND US: <br />Number of Ti <br />Development <br />Present Use <br />Present Zon <br />PROPOSAL <br />X <br />■e Number <br />Propose <br />Minimum <br />Propose