Laserfiche WebLink
: facts. <br />t floor) <br />drivaSf patio, <br />dar to construct a <br />a (29.3*x24.2*). The <br />iraqe at the street <br />iddltional expansion <br />floor and additional <br />lon has been aliped <br />4S* froe the 929.4 <br />t of the shoreline# <br />n only 17' froe the <br />aMiM ^ - ' . ■•; ■ -if ' "■■'■ . ■• ;r, : <br />Zoning File #1350 <br />November 16# 1988 <br />page 3 of 5 <br />The addition will also require a side setback variance from the new <br />division line from the north. The existing house on the south side is <br />approximately 21' from the south lot line and the existing lakeshore 9»rage <br />is approximately 3.6- from the lot line. If the applicants are “ked to <br />meet the 30' setback at the northeast corner of the proposed addition, <br />20'8" would not provide adequate width for a garage to function for two <br />Stall use. <br />At an earlier meeting with the applicants, staff asked the Borns if <br />the addition could be moved closer to the street as there appeared to e <br />adequate depth. The City would be more comfortable approving a street <br />setback variance by reducing the severe l“>'®»*‘ore setback proposed at 17 <br />at the northwest corner of the addition. The applicants advised that this <br />would not be a problem for the placement of the garage, but because of <br />tLir desire to expand the living area of the limited first fl^r. it was <br />imperative that they align the addition with the existing lake side of the <br />house. <br />The survey has located the existing house on the south side in order <br />to determine if there would be a visual impact on the lakeshore views. The <br />proposed addition will not encroach any closer into the lakes ^ ° <br />the resident to the south. The Helper property was not ^ <br />the higher 24'+ elevations. The Helpers will receive no visual impact from <br />Se proposed addition on the Born property. The City has received no <br />negative comments from the neighbors notified for this review. <br />Note the applicants' survey does not designate a walkway from the <br />garage to the existing front door steps. The <br />the front steps has an underliner and would be considered as hardcover. <br />Review Exhibit K, note this specific area is out of the 75' setback area <br />The 75-250' setback area proposed at 14% total hardcover <br />increase for the 60 s.f. of crushed landscape area and a <br />exceed a 4' width for a distance of 20' at 80 s.f. The 75- ar <br />facts should be adjusted to include the additional total of 140 s.f. of <br />hardcover.