Laserfiche WebLink
A sar <br />the location of the <br />las been drawn in at <br />r viewing the site, <br />tely 15* from the <br />mlations have been <br />ty, for the sake of <br />a prior to the Stop <br />ce that date. <br />It of construction <br />>rtions of a second <br />LO.9% in the 0-75* <br />ne is 2,261 s.f. or <br />^5* zone. <br />ding approximately <br />:ous fabric), is <br />opose to remove a <br />>so wish after-the- <br />supply building, <br />was found by the <br />o the neighboring <br />r of 62 s.f. in the <br />dcover <br />r 28.4« <br />r 19.5i <br />>uid be needed for <br />Zoning File #1353 <br />November 14, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />jmm <br />A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed <br />within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. <br />B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool is considered an <br />accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than <br />the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is <br />normally allowed. <br />C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure <br />constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in <br />the 0-75' setback zone, and includes land alteration to raise the <br />grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where <br />no such land alteration is normally allowed in the 0-75' zone. <br />D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and <br />land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. <br />E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard <br />setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the <br />City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property <br />line. Note that although this structure is less than 120 s.f. in <br />area, hence it does not technically require a permit, it still <br />must meet the zoning setback requirements. <br />The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional <br />run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron <br />such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within <br />the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower <br />rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pod. Similar <br />types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the <br />Bennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore <br />areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Orono. Note <br />that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris <br />and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground <br />for natural dispersal into the watertable.