11-21-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

facts. Floor) veSf patiOf andi to construct a 29.3*x24.2'). Th« |e at the street .tional expansion ir and additional has been alignod £ro» the 929.4 ' the shoreline* %lf 17 ‘ fro« the jP^i • 'Um- : i m a-’l* m : ;•:; .^T3n^ 'l>-rnm& .‘mitm 'iM'H/ Zoning File #1350 November 16^ 1988 Page 3 of 5 The addition will also require a side setback variance from the new division line from the north. The existing house on the south side is approximately 21' from the south lot line and the existing lakeshore garage is approximately 3.6’ from the lot line. If the applicants are asked to meet the 30* setback at the northeast corner of the proposed addition, 20'8" would not provide adequate width for a garage to function for two stall use. At an earlier meeting with the applicants, staff asked the Borns if the addition could be moved closer to the street as there appeared to be adequate depth. The City would be more comfortable approving a street setback variance by reducing the severe lakeshore setback proposed at 17* at the northwest corner of the addition. The applicants advised that this would not be a problem for the placement of the garage, but because of their desire to expand the living area of the limited first floor, it was imperative that they align the addition with the existing lake side of the house. The survey has located the existing house on the south side in order to determine if there would be a visual impact on the lakeshore views. The proposed addition will not encroach any closer into the lakeshore views of the resident to the south. The Helper property was not included because of the higher elevations. The Helpers will receive no visual impact from the proposed addition on the Born property. The City has received no negative cosonents from the neighbors notified for this review. Note the applicants' survey does net designate a walkway from the garage to the existing front door steps. The crushed landscaping around the front steps has an underliner and would be considered as hardcover. Review Exhibit K, note this specific area is out of the 75* setback area. The 75-250’ setback area proposed at 14% total hardcover would allow an increase for the 60 s.f. of crushed landscape area and a walkway not to exceed a 4* width for a distance of 20' at 80 s.f. The 75-250’ hardcover facts should be adjusted to include the additional total of 140 s.f. of hardcover. ^4^. . • :7. ■ V;; X1 ' •I- ''1 Pt'" 1 r-.: Zoning File November 16 Page 4 of f Staff Recoi To api Joyce Born Shoreline I fy*' h * 2. I hardc impro This 2. fina Insp