Laserfiche WebLink
■ ... <br />the location of the <br />has been dra%m in at <br />8r viewing the site, <br />ately 15* from the <br />Leulations have been <br />'ey, for the sake of <br />ed prior to the Stop <br />nee that date. <br />Bnt of construction <br />portions of a second <br />10.9% in the 0-75* <br />one is 2,261 s.f. or <br />-75* 2one. <br />uding approximately <br />>rou8 fabric), is <br />propose to remove a <br />ilso wish after-the- <br />d supply building, <br />I was found by the <br />to the neighboring <br />er of 62 ».f. in the <br />irdcover <br />or 28.4% <br />or 69.5% <br />^Olild be needed for <br />-5 <br />4 <br />F: <br />K <br />■■■M <br />>iK-y'-H- r.■ V -i. <br />Zoning File #1353 <br />November 14, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />6. <br />A) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Structures are not allowed <br />within the 75* lakeshore setback zone. <br />B) Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - This pool is considered an <br />accessory structure that is located closer to the shoreline than <br />the average lakeshore setback line, past which no encroachment is <br />normally allowed. <br />C) Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - The proposed structure <br />constitutes hardcover in excess of the 0% hardcover allowed in <br />the 0-75* setback zone, and Includes land alteration to raise the <br />grade approximately 3* higher than the pre-existing grade, where <br />no such land alteration Is normally allowed in the 0-75* zone. <br />D) Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Also prohibits structures and <br />land alteration within the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. <br />E) Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) - The required side yard <br />setback for any structure is 10*. There is no basis on which the <br />City can grant approval for a structure that straddles a property <br />line. Note that although this structure is less than 120 s.f. in <br />area, hence it does not technically require a permit, it still <br />must meet the zoning setback requirements. <br />The applicants are proposing to mitigate the effects of the additional <br />run-off created by the pool and patio, by constructing the pool apron <br />such that all water falling on the pool and patio is contained within <br />the pool itself, with an overflow discharge at a presumably slower <br />rate into a drainfield to be located adjacent to the pool. Similar <br />types of run-off infiltration structures have been suggested by the <br />Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District for use in lakeshore <br />areas, however, such a practice has not been adopted in Oreno. Note <br />that, if the drainfield system works as proposed, most of the debris <br />and nutrients carried in the run-off would be carried into the ground <br />for natural dispersal into the watertable.