Laserfiche WebLink
■■i-^ V ■k- '. : I rkcM^h r!*> ^ •■ <br />TOs Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />FROM: <br />DATS: <br />Subject: <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning AdministratOir <br />November 17r 1988 <br />#1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive - <br />Variance - Referral From Council For Further Review <br />Exhibit A - Notice of Council Action Dated 10/26/88 <br />Exhibit B ~ Survey Showing Proposed Hardcover Removals <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 10/20/88 <br />Council reviewed this application at their October 24th <br />mA«<*lna and voted 5 to 0 to refer this item back to Planning Commisison ?or further consider at i^^^^ Specifically, the council asks Planning <br />Commission to determine whether a hardship exists and ask applicant <br />consider alternatives to the additional accessory structure on the <br />property. <br />Note that Council indicated they would likely allow the proposed <br />garage to be 5' from the sewer line (see staff memo of 10/2bj. <br />staff met with the applicant on 11/16/68 to 1^^^ <br />alternatives. Applicant notes that he is willing to remove the 10 x lo <br />tin shed near the boat house, since the shed is hf^tta^^willing to remove the plastic from the two areas shaded on the attac <br />survey• <br />In discussing the potential for expanding the existing 9»rage the <br />applicant noted that the existing attached garage is <br />lot line and extending it to create more storage space would involve an <br />extreme side setback variance. Also, it is apparent that expansion <br />existing garage further northward would be relatively expensive <br />eliminaM^SiS main entranceway to the house. There does not seem to be any <br />logical way to expand the existing garage. <br />Applicant notes he would prefer not to reduce the 24* dimension <br />of the proposed garage. His existing garage is not Y“y "2 <br />little stoW space. Applicant noted he ILTf?nding ofthe items he needs to store, which may provide the basis for a findl g <br />hardship. Note that with the proposed hardcover removals, final hardcover <br />will be decreased from 18.6% to 17.7% in the 0-75 zone. *" "“2 <br />found in staffs 75-250' original hardcover calculations, <br />hardcover is 31.5%. Applicant proposes to ot 28 7% <br />plastic, resulting in final 75-250* hardcover of 6235 square feet or 28.7%. <br />recommendation for approval would be appropriate, accompanied y <br />the hardships. <br />n <br />"'■A, <br />m. <br />..vr <br />h' •' ^ <br />ClfF OP ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Ml <br />TO:Einar Hagb <br />740 North <br />Mound, MN <br />ttpb of applici <br />DATE OF NBBTIMC <br />COORCIL ACTION <br />To refer 1 <br />exists, also <br />structure on t; <br />Council e <br />be 5* from the <br />This itei <br />Commission at t <br />Mike Gafi <br />various a Item <br />If you dej <br />are available <br />approval by th <br />I. • 4 <br />M -i