Laserfiche WebLink
p^:;^ ■ - -r "V:;v-^#1761 - Doiiqla* H. Smith Novembor 10« 19S3 Page 2 <br />Lot 18 is still maintained as part of the Tuthill yard. <br />aaraae once used by the main house is located on Lot 18, Both the <br />aDolicant and Tuthill claim they knew nothing of the limitations of <br />?KSi?3iiaJ?^ Remember, the ordinance haa been in effect since 1967. <br />Tuthill purchased all three lota in 1971. <br />t^cv V'juid i>rc>ter t.ibln-.i th>- apuJxcation until the study is completed. <br />1 should add, this was convoyed to the applicant's contractor at <br />Mrnf review mectim in July. Since that first meeting, ® <br />h.« h.d contact with the C^Ly asking for action on the application, toth <br />cants. Oouo Smith and tho Richard Tuthi1Is,were present at the Planning <br />rjrtf:*'I H.'i ion m<ietinq in October, <br />review exhibit M. The Tuthill house is located 11.6* <br />I have no confirmation as to the setback of the residence 19, <br />although, the owner has stated the house is approximately 6 feet from the <br />shtirod lot line. <br />Review the lot survey of the Casco Circle neigh^rhood. The lot appears <br />to bo 5' loss in width than ->thor comparable lots on the Circle. <br />Tha applicant has provided a site plan showing the proposed residence meeting <br />all setback and hardcover standards;, <br />I would suggest that Council once again ask applicant if he “^hTn <br />;,0 of the h^plientton until the •* ""T" <br />Btudy^is completed. If not, you must act Giving conceptual direction to <br />staff to draft the necessary icsolution. <br />First, do you have enough information to act? For ‘ , <br />area of Lots 16 & 17? Would a lot line rearrangement be feasible? Is this <br />lot consistent with the pattern of the surrounding developed lots? <br />Sewer and water are available. Lot 18 never received a unit charge, only <br />a footnqo charge. <br />rr council acts to approve the Smith <br />majority opinion (4-21 of fhe PI.inning commission as follows. <br />to aoDrovr* a lot area variance (100% standards of ^ <br />and lot width variance (100» standard) of 45>* ^ 5®“^ 3237 cSaco <br />permit construction of a new residence on a property located at 3237 CaJCO <br />Circ^. based on the foliowint? findings: