My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
05-24-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2023 12:12:45 PM
Creation date
12/26/2023 12:08:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the orono planning commission meeting <br />HELD APRIL 19, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1811 - CONT. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval <br />of Application #1811 for C. Jack Remien, 3237 Casco Circle, <br />approving lot area and width variances to construct a new <br />residence. <br />Johnson said he respects the position of all involved and <br />could not support the request as he felt the property should be <br />combined with Lot 19 as one condition for approval is that no <br />additional land is available. <br />Bellows felt that was an Incorrect Interpretation of the code. <br />Mabusth noted the code specifically states that substandard <br />whether in single separate or commonly owned, are to be judged on <br />their own merits. The finding that no additional land Is available <br />was validated during the variance review because at the time tne <br />lot was not owned in common with adjacent lots. <br />Peterson felt approval requires too many variances. <br />Schroeder questioned why the neighbors did not buy the parcel. <br />Mrs. Blelke stated they were unaware that It was for sale until too <br />I ate. <br />Jay and Gay Richards, 3243 Casco Circle, stated they were 9'^®” <br />Impression that Remien purchased the parcel for use in conjunction <br />with Lot 19. He said the only reason why the City <br />variance In the past was because It had been taxed as bulldable, <br />and an attorney owned it at the time and the City did not want to <br />be brought into legal action. <br />Bellows felt that issue was not pertinent. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, nays 2. Johnson and Peterson voted nay. <br />(#11) #1812 THOMAS PATRICK GOODYEAR, <br />712 TONKAWA ROAD <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 - 9:05 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of PubIication and Certificate of Mai Iing were noted. <br />Mr. Goodyear was present. <br />Mabusth reviewed the applicants request to add a second story to <br />the existing residence, including the <br />into the right side yard to square off ^,^®^ <br />applicant also proposes alterations to the existing boat
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.