My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
05-24-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2023 12:12:45 PM
Creation date
12/26/2023 12:08:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
N <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MA\ 24, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE «1811 - CONT. <br />Kelley asked the applicant his hardship. <br />Rvi’^ien said he purchased the parcel as a buildable lot and If <br />c„';!bined he would suffer a substantial loss. He stated he purchased <br />tho parcel for $80,000 and intends to sell for $92,000, but will <br />not realize a financial gain as he must pay the realtor fees, <br />attorney fees and has paid taxes on the parcel . He felt the <br />hardship is that there is no additional property to combine to this <br />property to make it conforming, but added it does contain the <br />necessary square footage. He said he has maintained the vacant <br />parcel, but has viewed it as completely independent from Is <br />homestead parcel. <br />Mayor Callahan asked the applicant If he had ooposed the previous <br />variance request. <br />Remlen replied his former wife opposed the variance in 1987, and <br />in fact, she was not listed as a property owner at the time. In <br />final resolve, he purchased the property after the variance <br />approve I with the intent to maintain or sell as a buildable lot. <br />Hurr clarified that he receives two separate tax statements. <br />Remlen stated that Is correct. <br />Hurr asked aoout the narrowest developed property In the area. <br />Bachman noted the staff report indicates this parcel is 5’ narrower <br />than +he next smallest developed property. <br />Gaffron clarified that the two parcels next to this property are <br />also 55’ wide, but there are no lots narrower than this property. <br />Dotzenroth stated there are no lots narrower than this property, <br />and requested Council to again consider the environmental impacts. <br />Jabbour replied that the vacant parcel could contain hardcover even <br />If combined with the adjacent parcel. <br />Dave Truax, Remlen’s realtor, disagreed with the position held by <br />Hare that the values In the area will be reduced. He stated both <br />the Remlens and the Blelkes enjoy the benefits of the vacant <br />parceI . <br />1:1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.