Laserfiche WebLink
1988 <br />rch and <br />have a <br />. They <br />Purdy <br />athroom <br />cult to <br />sd why, <br />B floor <br />do the <br />It* al 1. <br />b1 of a <br />er time <br />tion to <br />fhen it <br />e only <br />front. <br />>n , but <br />raid of <br />>oaed 5 <br />manent <br />What <br />f years <br />in they <br />/en the <br />id not <br />sd upon <br />in that <br />rom the <br />t Road. <br />I to 15 <br />house, <br />e there <br />sr near <br />kennel <br />ling to <br />hearing <br />commend! <br />recedent <br />ty added <br />:ed that <br />it added <br />ley have <br />d allow <br />Gaffron <br />I;; <br />A 1 <br />!L <br />'■ .V --" • <br />£■* <br />MINUTBS OF THB PLANNING CONHISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988• • a 'ZONING PILE #1311 CONTINUEDasked applicants if they would prefer tabling this matter so they <br />could present a revised plan at a later meeting? Applicants <br />wanted the Planning Commission to vote on the matter as currently <br />proposed. Motion, Ayes«6, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1312 WILLIAM J. LAUER <br />3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. - 8:30 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />noted . <br />Applicant was present for this matter.’ <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the applicant was <br />seeking approval for a hardcover variance for an addition that <br />will not encroach in the average lakeshore setback or 75' <br />lakeshore setback areas. The variance would allow a 1.89% <br />hardcover increase in the 75-250' setback area. The project will <br />not require major excavation or land alterations. <br />e <br />Bellows asked for readable plans. Mabusth stated that the <br />sketch showing the proposal was staff's sketch. An updated <br />survey showing the driveway was not submitted with the <br />application. Bellows admonished the Zoning Department for <br />accepting incomplete plans. Applicant stated that he was not <br />aware that the City required any further information. Mabusth <br />noted for both applicant and Commission members that the land use <br />application clearly states that a survey is required. Kelley <br />suggested revising the variance application. Ee wanted to change <br />item #4 under "Required Submittals" to include the language <br />"current and proposed". <br />Mr. Lauer stated that he had reviewed the staff's drawings <br />and felt that they were correct. Mabusth stated that the <br />applicant showed 245 s.f. more hardcover than staff's <br />calculations. Johnson asked if tha 1.89% hardcover Increase was <br />based upon staff's calculations? ’ Mabusth stated that the <br />percentage was based upon applicant's calculations, staff's <br />percentage was less. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />approval of #1312, per staff's recommendations and option B <br />regarding conditions of approval. Cohen asked Mabusth what <br />percentage of hardcover needed to be removed from the 250-500' <br />2one. Mabusth stated that applicant could remove 1.89% hardcover <br />by removing accessory structures in the 250-500' zone. Mabusth <br />asked applicant if he was familiar with the language preceded <br />with, an asterik that stated that the hardcover variance was <br />• • <br />I <br />} . <br />•'1 <br />TO:FPC <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJ: <br />J <br />APPLICATIOl <br />t <br />VARIANCES 1 <br />I <br />ZONING DISt <br />LIST OF EX] <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />S <br />P <br />G <br />B <br />I <br />A] <br />p: <br />P]m <br />A’ <br />Pi <br />N< <br />Pi <br />Pi <br />PERTINENT <br />1. I <br />75' and 75 <br />encroached <br />the applic <br />the addit: <br />their prof <br />from the w <br />approximat <br />2. t: <br />existing i <br />inspection <br />fabric del <br />Current hi <br />them, are <br />r