Laserfiche WebLink
If •111 <br />m Acnw <br />9tice: 8-18-88 <br />>n's desire that <br />I closer to the <br />:he hardships of <br />envelope might <br />I concerned, (in <br />ildings on the <br />nting to set a <br />ariance. <br />t 7s00 p.m. Any <br />r City Council <br />ling Commission <br />ter review and <br />IM <br />4^ <br />1 <br />'u- <br />i* <br />• • • • t I f* *HIMUTBS OF THB PLiVNNING COMMISSION £TIN6 HELD AUGUST 15, )9S8 <br />ZONING PILE #1321 CONTINUED ^ <br />access to all new residential development. Johnson said that the <br />School District could vacate the road if they do not need to use <br />it when the four parcls are acquired by the School District. <br />Kelley stated that he would like to see a topographical map <br />of the area, along with other planning criteria. Moos asked if <br />it would not be most beneficial to the owners to have the parcel <br />platted in case the School District did not follow through with <br />the purchase of the entire parcel. Kelley asked whether the <br />applicant wanted the Planning Commission to vote on the <br />information as presented and forward it to the City Council. <br />Applicant stated that he wanted them to vote and send the matter <br />to the City Council. <br />’ There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend <br />denial of the request for a variance on the grounds that the <br />request does not meet the required standards. The Planning <br />Commission recommended that the parcel in question be properly <br />subdivided to ensure that future planning needs of the City are <br />met reoardless of the disposition of the property. Motion, <br />Ayes«5, Johnson»Nay. Johnson suggested that the Commission <br />approve this matter conditioned upon restrictive covenants as to <br />transfefahce ofthe'remining^parcels B, C, and D. <br />11311 JOHN a SUSAN PURDY <br />1975 FAGERHESS POINT ROAD <br />VARIAHCBS <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:05 P.M. - 8:20 P.M. <br />N <br />The Affidavit^of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Purdy were present for this matter <br />Gaffron explained that the applicants were seeking variances <br />for the purpose of adding a screen porch to their home on the <br />lakeshore side. The Purdys were granted a variance back in 1985 <br />to put an addition on the street side of their home. Applicants <br />are in need of a hardcover variance as well as a variance to <br />encroach in the average lakeshore setback and lakeshore setback. <br />The Purdys had a 5 year plan at one point that has since been <br />revised. The existing hardcover calculation in the 0-75* zone is <br />15.4% and does not include the permeable fabric underneath the <br />rockbeds. Applicants are requesting an increase in hardcover to <br />17.3%. In the 75-250* zone, the requested increase in hardcover <br />is 19.9% from 19.1%. <br />Kelley asked the applicants if they would like to present <br />.fj <br />MINUTESZONING 1 <br />their m <br />proposa] <br />that th< <br />flowed € <br />to any < <br />the ne: <br />configu <br />necessa <br />logical <br />additloi <br />neighbo: <br />virtual <br />improve <br />bathroom <br />average <br />the sout <br />inconsis <br />Bel <br />addition <br />room wer <br />plan, bu <br />limit ac <br />access w< <br />light ii <br />Bellows <br />Mr. Purd <br />bathroon <br />porch wc <br />possible <br />house. 1 <br />to view 1 <br />living oi <br />request 1 <br />that the <br />porch. <br />Be 1 <br />applicani <br />ambitiou <br />stated tf <br />requests <br />Kelley at <br />3-season <br />them the <br />really n< <br />a half an <br />3ro«< <br />origins 1 <br />origins 1 <br />Purdy St. <br />r