Laserfiche WebLink
• ; • ..> -%* I. ■•4 <br />ey would have to close <br />;oet per foot and with <br />#ever# the question of <br />at this time.■‘'■■/a <br />fmum <br />11: <br />I. <br />I., <br />4 <br />■« <br />- ■■ ■■■•-:.--I- <br />MINUTES OP regular ORONO COUNCIL MEETING ^-^^r»\1988 <br />APPOINTMENT - PARK COMMISSION CHAIR* <br />Connn^'^i C o u n c i 1 mem be r Callahan, seconded by <br />Comm/^aVon rt appoint Mr. Phil Bradley as Park <br />Na^io? SCtion'pasfed!^’^^''® ^8, 1988. Motion, Ayes=3, <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD <br />10A7 Bernhardson explained that the July <br />i-o r- Storm , damaged the shoreline for a length of 300' <br />to 400 on Crystal Bay Road. The City of Orono does not have a <br />the tra^veJyTed^no^i-^'^^^^i Road, only an easement that covers the travelled portion of the road. Originally, the Puhlio Wo»-v« <br />Department was trying to seek a solution whereby they ecu <br />brought forward recommendations for either <br />brthe'’a7e o/crTbbi’na^®^^"^ ^"'^tting, restoring the bLkOf cribbing, or moving the road back 12' and reducino <br />was Lt'’fl determined that moving the roal <br />was not feasible because of limited front yard areas which the <br />a lack or.® unwilling to give up. There was a problen, dL*^to <br />a lack of easement control as to gettinc coordinator. <br />acceptance for payment of one of the other two solutions. One of <br />foot Dyyyna%l?-°°/“"%®^ “’® S120.00/irnerftoot. During this time frame. Public Works Dirprhor toK« <br />Gerhardson, was in contact with residents on the road. There was <br />in Aoril^w^hYoh^ made so an alternate solution was proposed <br />Clhv^nmnH^ 1 placing sheathing within the area the <br />rist(^^^ation^^T t finance the^ on of anything but public property. For safety <br />purposes, a temporary guardrail would be placed along the portion <br />of the road where the bank needed restoring. Portion <br />At thlt^tlSr^’^h®^ was taken to the Planning Commission in July. <br />tL Voad^ M? residents indicated that they wanted to close <br />December 1987 i^^urmally indicated back incember, 1987 that they would not agree to close the road. One <br />fact that the street is currently a <br />through street and public safety access would be a concern ^If <br />the road is closed in the front, there may be a need for ac’cess <br />Bt'the*jSlv'’l8'*'Y9“sB°"Df'’® ''®“ requestedat the July 18, 1988 Planning Commission .Meeting that the Citv of <br />rirn * '’® reapproached on the issue of closlnc%he <br />12 1988 Council®‘^rscussed this matter at their September <br />in'favor of croslng®\he"’roa''d '=‘'at they were still not <br />Administrator Bernhardson stated that the Citv would <br />It this ongoing problem by proceeding with ?h. <br />sheathing. This would restore the road now and allow th! <br />residents to deal with the dead-end/cul-de-sac issue at a later <br />«T <br />5;- <br />m <br />a/' <br />m <br />1 <br />sy ' ■ <br />■r.r <br />"id <br />a- <br />CR