Laserfiche WebLink
It.-:''; V;. <br />Offices <br />inced <br />y the <br />quest <br />area <br />jrlng <br />r of <br />seach <br />that <br />iafety <br />orks <br />|ed in <br />l)ther <br />Bent <br />%fa8 <br />|f the <br />ligain <br />.1 to <br />it to <br />[<^ers <br />ends, <br />ono. <br />vilX <br />Your <br />* . j <br />ik. <br />'V <br />w <br />jC:.: <br />10588.4 <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardsonr City Administrator <br />DATS:October 5, 1988 <br />SOBJBCT: Crystal Bay Road <br />Attachments:A. Notification to Residents - 10/17/88 Planning <br />Commission Meeting <br />B. Letter to City of Minnetonka Beach Dated 10/5/88 <br />C. Traffic Criteria for Closure <br />ISSUE - <br />Provision of information to Council regarding progress on repair <br />of Crystal Bay Road together with framework for determination of <br />closure. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the Council's September 28, 1988 meeting <br />following discussion by residents and the Council the staff was <br />directed to continue the application for repair at the Planning <br />Commission, informing abutting residents of the proposed repair, <br />request from Minnetonka Boach a written statement of thir <br />position regarding closure and work to develop the criteria for a <br />decision framework. <br />DICUSSION - As noted in Attachment A the residents have been <br />notified of the meeting indicating that because of the fact that <br />no specific plan has come forward from the residents as to where <br />the road is to be terminated that the road road repair proposed <br />by the staff should be processed through the Planning Commission <br />so the Council can make a decision regarding the road repair and <br />the closure in timely fashion in order to take the necessary <br />steps this year to complete the work. The staff is looking on <br />alternatives to the repair and the snowfence to provide for <br />adequate safety yet this fall. <br />AS for the draft criteria for closure the staff is circulating <br />that to the attorney and engineer together with further <br />consideration by itself and would appreciate any input from the <br />Council or the neighborhood. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Accept <br />2* Comment on process or criteria <br />3» Table for futher discussion <br />4 take no action <br />'r'H <br />■ 4 -"4 <br />RECOM <br />info r I <br />procej <br />1988 a <br />PROPOS <br />direct <br />1988 C