10-17-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e private driveway jst the two houses •uctures meets the le mirrors to pass# esidences served. Dt, the City would ad and the gateway :icipated that the de of the driveway y light fixture is uite popularf both as well as being a posts were located considered as an riance. Since the side lot line and s necessary. ^^ey, the westerly ity easement along structure, the City ainage and utility structure, normally nents, and there is utilities to the lire is allowed as in favor of the City :o use the easement, :hat they do to the Lis application is not sufficient to t would seem that Dvide the type of may very well be fic. On the other nted or uninvited -10* high fence or - •. V; •f MM ^7- 1: P \M Zoning File #1347 October 12, 1988 Page 3 of 3 Vrtv\°ae.the security required, the^propertj^owner^then might ^ stafV'^ould suggest that the proposed gateway will fSfnelghitrhobo ’d. ^^-^eed* measures required by the property owner without the need for extensiv additional fences or walls. Staff Reconnendation - staff would recommend approval of the project as proposed, with the tTat aoD^ sign a Hold Harmless Agreement in favor of the C?ty and° otheV p^t^e^Ua? -utility and drainage easement- users. v-v m»K- ii'" iJ-'-- ■ :■ - ^ =. fill Mi ■‘••M ■R/ -Ha ■ -'U ‘ V ■ -< ■ mM m^m imrtm r 'Y HAROSBllDesf DBSCRIP' Dei Co< require ; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Co; Ce th 34 St na ob Ce To in PI As ar Ac The Ap rememb informc Certif: Zoning APPLIC The ai reques unusua the ir knowle Applic OHllERS The ov author agents tion a Owner* Applit Plann: third revi*e^ unabl< authoi Office