Laserfiche WebLink
Plan Amendment <br />Note on Page 37 <br />considered for <br />md 51 you will <br />property. Page <br />ire rezoning of <br />be rezoned to <br />ewer and to be <br />18 to serve all <br />mt of the R-IA <br />approved, the <br />a order for the <br />i directives of <br />A is necessary, <br />s: <br />division plans <br />se requirements <br />sr of building <br />f such lots or <br />ements of the <br />1." <br />mixed 1 and 2 <br />let has to be <br />[1 Amendment. <br />n <br />al of 25 units <br />LS shown on the <br />ows a formal <br />ation is a PRD <br />ig a buffer and <br />}perties. <br />ember 19, 1988 <br />for approving <br />highest point <br />e separation. <br />problems with <br />3sal system. <br />cial minimum <br />ng ordinance <br />Zoning Pile #1333 October 7, 1988 Page 3 of 3 <br />3. Sanitary sewer will be provided as confirmed by the City <br />Engineer's preliminary review. Sewer to be provided either through <br />Long Lake by the Joint Powers Agreement or by constructing a new <br />interceptor along the Highway 12 corridor. <br />4. The rezoning will allow single family residential development. <br />5. The property is immediately adjacent to a commercial corridor <br />along Highway 12 and the proposed 1 acre zoning would provide an <br />excellent buffer to the surrounding rural residential districts. <br />6. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment included this property within the <br />MUSA district and approved Municipal services for the area. <br />7. The current code will require rezoning to R-lA in order to allow <br />the 1 acre densities recommended in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />The issue of sewer remains unresolved at this point, but the City <br />Engineer confirms that there are available alternatives for servicing the <br />property with sewer. The question remains how the property will be <br />sewer either via the Long Lake system or the extension of <br />Orono's Municipal sewer lines. The owner is aware of his obligation to <br />pay for any extension of Municipal sewer to the property. <br />Planning Comnission Recommendation - <br />The Planning Commission approved the rezoning of the northern portion <br />this property from RR—lB to R—lA based on one or more of the findings <br />noted above in the staff memo. The minority opinion denied the rezoning <br />based on the precedent setting aspect stating that they were fearful that <br />the surrounding rural areas would request the saune kind of rezoning. The <br />surrounding rural residential properties were not included within this <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment and as a result were not included within the <br />newly aligned MUSA district. There can be no rezoning from RR-IB to R-IA <br />without sewer. In order to allow the rezoning to a greater density, the <br />City would have to initiate a new Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The <br />enclosed resolution has been drafted approving the rezoning as requested by <br />the applicant authorizing staff to prepare the necessary ordinance amend~ <br />ment for formal action by the Council upon final resolve of the extension <br />of sewer to the property. <br />CITY <br />Bob Kost <br />Bennett, Rin< <br />700 3rd Stre€ <br />Minneapolis, <br />Dear Bob: <br />As pron <br />representati <br />summarize the <br />1. No <br />30 to 50 <br />3. Make <br />structur <br />4. Cul <br />depictin« <br />3 a Item <br />for vert; <br />5. Acc <br />open spa <br />City is 1 <br />defined t <br />6. Ro< <br />residenti <br />property <br />ask for <br />proposed <br />that the <br />commercia <br />7. Inf <br />realizin <br />the impac <br />8. Loca <br />each buili <br />BUILDfNG a ZONING - 473*7 <br />ASSESSING