Laserfiche WebLink
each lotr 25 x <br />ts for the road <br />led as an access <br />r retention pond <br />lary hydraulic <br />ine appropriate <br />saced areas are <br />not meet City <br />ider's agreement <br />>r to scheduling <br />id agreement to <br />eich pad (area of <br />[ided to include <br />h pad - total <br />r structures for <br />- require the <br />find require City <br />pproval for the <br />in each pad and <br />such trees to be <br />ropriate for the <br />rmsr etc.) along <br />*3 <br />I ' <br />'v, <br />To:Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />October 7, 1988 <br />Subject: #1333 Sidney Rebers^ 715 North Brovn Road <br />Rezoning - Resolution <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Exhibit J <br />Exhibit K <br />Exhibit L <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Public Hearing Notice <br />Legal Description for Area to be Rezoned <br />Letter From Platteters at 809 North Brown Road <br />Shardlow Memo <br />Intent R-IA Code Section <br />PRD Code <br />Map of Zoning Boundaries <br />Map of Zoning Boundary Lines <br />Sections of Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />Residential Development Plan of Property <br />Application - Rezoning From RR-IB (Rural, Non-sewered, 2 Acre Lots) to R-lA <br />(Sewered, 1-Acre Lots). Review Exhibit I, note that 55' of RR-IB <br />remains for future rezoning to either existing B-1 commercial or <br />another zoning classification at some future date. <br />Total area to be rezoned » 3 2.6 acres. <br />Brief Review of Application - <br />On August 15, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan <br />for the comprehensive proposal of Sidney Rebers and conceptually approved <br />the development plans. The Planning Commission held the formal public <br />hearings for the required rezoning and the subdivision/PRD for the <br />development phase of the application. The rezoning phase of the <br />application was approved by the Planning Commission and the subdivision/PRD <br />was tabled pending resolve of the concerns of the Planning Commission. <br />Please review Exhibit F, John Shardlow's review memo for the public <br />hearing, specifically Pages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 as they pertain specifically <br />to the re zoning request. As Shardlow's memo notes on Page 2, although the <br />Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the zoning ordinance <br />amendment required as a result of the passage of the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment, the standards of the proposed ordinance amendment are not <br />applicable in the review of this application. Shardlow's review comments <br />deal predominantly with the relation of the application to the rezoning <br />application to the proposed ordinance amendment. <br />Staff's report will deal solely with the review of the application <br />based on the recently approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the <br />pertinent sections of the current zoning code that are applicable. <br />iiii <br />m <br />»sl <br />Pi <br />mm <br />m <br />'#1 <br />iulil <br />Zoning Fi October 7 <br />Page 2 of <br />Pleai <br />that deal <br />where it i <br />change anc <br />find two <br />52, the re <br />the 55' c <br />commercia <br />developed <br />residentia <br />code. In <br />property ib <br />applicant <br />the Compre <br />Review PRE <br />"Subm. <br />for a <br />for e <br />lots, <br />units <br />zonin< <br />In on <br />acre or 1 <br />eunended to <br />The p; <br />based on th <br />Comprehen <br />conver tion <br />format with <br />lessening t <br />Pleas< <br />enclosed in <br />the rezonii <br />1. Topog: <br />V <br />t' <br />Mj <br />ii <br />2. Th <br />requir <br />amendme <br />r