10-17-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L will iS or :ed to Lling L the I hereby m. r*s \ ice of 311 to approved Bcifically 'i ■» *•. '-m kmmmmwm -1 :# ^ /M >. 1 ■■ WM:^. :i.,. v:>,s 1 • :V ■ VW y?:-.: ■ • r,:X : ’■ •JtJVmm Planning Coipmission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator October 13r 1988 Subject: #1334 Sidney ReberSf 715 North Brown Road - Condition Use Permit/PRD, Preliminary Subdivision Class III SScond Review Zoning District - RR-lA - Approved by the City Council on October 10, 1988 - Minimum area required is 1 acre. Pertinent Sections of the Code - Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (H) PRD development. - Conditional use permit required for Section 10.20 - R-IA Standards. Section 10.32 - PRD Code. Chapter 11 - Subdivision regulations. Total. Area - 32.6 acres Area — exclusive of road outlot - (2.47 acres) and future access corridor (.53 acres) » 29.6 Acres Section 10.31, Subdivision 2 one acre is required for one residential unit. Proposed unit density based on 29.6 acres * 1 unit per 1.18 acres. Average lot/Pad Area - 38,000 s.f. List of Exhibits - Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Rezoning Memo to Council 10/7/88 Letter to Kost 10/5/88 Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions 6 Easements for Meyer's Woods Comprehensive Plan Sections - Area 4 Amended or Revised Preliminary Plan The rezoning portion Council at the October 10, immediate rezoning subject for extension of municipal memo for members to review, standards as noted above, currently in effect. of the Rebers' application was acted on by the 1988 meeting. Approval was conditioned on the to the applicant agreeing to pay without appeal sewer to the property. Staff has enclosed the Note this review memo is based on current code The review will deal solely with ordinances mf .V. j 5?^ri V /■ .sP Zoning File #1334 October 13, 1988 Page 2 of 7 As discussed at 3rd, members were a October 4th with th members regarding the review Exhibit B, the by those in attendanc Sara Moos, Glenn Co< revised plan, it wo requests of those in with Mr. Kost, he ad complete survey of a building site, and promised that by you building pads and a i for each pad. Staff that meeting. If yo Block 1, Lots 2 and because of special gr< coverage. The following re plans: 1. No grading/wc 30 to 50' setbac) 2. The cul-de-si at the meeting, t for vertical co 3. Access rema adequate sightinc with the applies need to change advised to eithe] or further south because it woul property owners c on the north. 4. The open spa Lane. The City through the defir would not be con developed under benefits." The o PRD is that thej development. Th under the current