My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
10-17-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 11:09:55 AM
Creation date
12/20/2023 4:15:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br />la: - <br />« <br />■' fUA f [ <br />;-^V. <br />n <br />■. <br />,iik, i11 <br />r/' <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />October 10, 1988 <br />Subject: #1329 Thomas McNellis, 355 Woodhill Road <br />Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Revised Site Plan <br />Planning Commission Action Notice of 9/21/88 <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 9/19/88 <br />Memo & Exhibits of 9/14/88 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicants have revised their request by revising deck <br />configurations and the garage orientation, and have moved the house <br />slightly further south, so that the only variance needed is for the front <br />setback at the southeast corner of the house which will be 37' from the <br />front lot line rather than the required 50' setback. The current proposal <br />requires no work in the 26' wetland setback area. <br />Staff Recomiiiendation ~ <br />If Planning Commisson feels that the hardships suggested by the <br />applicant are valid, and if Planning Commission recommends approval of the <br />revised variance request, staff would suggest the following conditions of <br />approval: <br />1.Any additional encroachments or changes to the footprint and site plan <br />must be approved by the City. <br />Absolutely no grading work is allowed within 26' of the Drainage and <br />Conservation and Flowage Easements. <br />3.Appropriate erosion control measures shall be in place during all <br />phases of construction of this residence, to insure that no sediments <br />enter the wetland. <br />Staff would note for the record that necessary grading to accomplish <br />crossing of the drainage easement for construction of the septic <br />system was approved when the lot was subdivided, hence that would be <br />the only grading work anticipated within the drainage easement area. <br />m <br />I/S: <br />V, <br />—pprar”A- ■ .•R <br />* <br />CITY OF OROHO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, 1 <br />TO Thomas Me <br />5201 Ridg <br />Edina, MN <br />TYPE OF APPLIC <br />DATE OP NEETIM <br />Planning <br />Tabled fo: <br />HOTBS AND SPEC! <br />Planning <br />variances for t <br />denial, Planni: <br />additional time <br />Please ad <br />revised propos^ <br />Applicant' <br />additional inj <br />September 26, ] <br />If you des <br />minutes, they <br />approval by the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.