Laserfiche WebLink
Lstrator <br />rth Ferndale Road <br />Lng <br />northeast corner <br />lot is from the <br />along the north <br />plat map). <br />appear to be dry <br />rth to the south. <br />Gated along that <br />needed. <br />property due to <br />ey has not been <br />t such a survey <br />, ^-V <br />^ - .* <br />K'f* <br />\T- <br />Rm n <br />Mr. <br />i'-..mm' <br />m:pm <br />:<-vm <br />um^.mm■ T'. -- • •nyr.\L-.4?^:•[Tfiriidiiiinpiiiiiir £■m^:m <br />' ,'l-i .' <br />4 <br />f J <br />f ^ <br />y V- <br />f?:-■ <br />f;-Vv- <br /><1 <br />Zoning File #1326 <br />September 14, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />The appJicants' site evaluator has indicated feasible sites for both <br />primary and alternate drainfield systems. Those «it“ loc t <br />centrally on the lot along the east boundary line. (See Exhibit H) <br />Both the primary and alternate sites require mound systems, and the <br />slopes at the proposed sites range from 2% to 4%, well within t <br />acceptable range for mound systems. <br />The oeneral drainage direction within the area of the mound sites <br />wollHlplar visually to be parallel to the east lot 1^"®' hence <br />leither the proposed house development nor proposed septic sysf®™® <br />llolll havl Ly runoff effect on the neighboring Hauser property to <br />the east. <br />care will have to be taken to direct surface run-off ^he <br />llLnfield sites, and given the Pfh?““design plan, the location of the drainfield sites places a relatively <br />severe restriction on the proposed house location. A^ain, <br />site planning will be necessary to insure that ^he natural flo <br />overland drainage in addition to the run-off from the house <br />development does not affect the septic system. <br />Mni-o that the proposed division creates a "flag" type lot, with a <br />corridor 60' in width running about 230' bdtore the <br />Thirrequires a lot width variance, since the defined "ifth of this <br />property ii 11 be 60- where a 200' width is normally 5®<J “i*^®^' <br />also that the lot is 320' in east/west width at its widest Point and <br />actually con lins more than 2 acres in just the area south of the <br />narrow corridor. <br />AS you can see from the plat map, staff has sketched in ^b® <br />of the private easement road which currently <br />width and comprises approxim=>->=^j ^033opportunity to initiate an appropriate aedi«^^^ <br />lorr*lor 16.5- south and north of the north l°t,li"®^°^.“e parcel in <br />question. Also note that the plat of P®irw®y Vi®w to the west has a <br />plat road outlot width of 50- on the "°rth/south portion but 30 on <br />the east/west portion. That plat was completed in 1977. The outiot <br />^Sld plrc^l on the plat of lairway View is currently owned by the <br />owner of Lot 5. <br />liMI4 • <br />Zoning Fil <br />September <br />Page 3 of <br />Discussi( <br />On tt <br />approximat <br />residence \ <br />proposed 1< <br />This ] <br />subdivisioi <br />lot confic <br />Exhibit G." <br />Staff Recos <br />Staff <br />the follow! <br />1. The <br />#36-lJ <br />of th« <br />purpos <br />situat <br />Road" <br />2. Va <br />3. Pr: <br />a topo <br />patter <br />proper* <br />4. Th€ <br />colled <br />5. Th€ <br />plat di