Laserfiche WebLink
vOAT <br />CITYNO. 7OF426 <br />ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />r G <br />4kEsH0°' <br />located." This condition is not applicable, as a residential deck improvement is an allowed <br />use in the LR-1A District. <br />B7."The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling."This condition is not applicable. <br />B8."The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property."The home location, the Property's topography <br />and orientation with respect to the lakeshore and the adjacent homes create difficulties <br />for the Applicant in improving the property consistent with the homes in their <br />neighborhood on the lake side. <br />B9."The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br />land is located."The linear shoreline and generally linear placement of neighboring homes <br />applies to the other homes in the immediate neighborhood. The neighboring home to the <br />south is considerably set back from the lake than the Applicant's home and the home on <br />the north side of the Property resulting in an extreme setback condition. <br />B10."The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant."The Applicant has stated it is necessary for the <br />preservation of the property right of the owners. <br />B11."The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or <br />morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the <br />requested after-the-fact variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the <br />zoning chapter. <br />B12."The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty."The Property had an existing deck in the <br />same footprint. The stair configuration is new however does not impact views of the lake <br />for the neighbors. The variances are necessary and does not merely serve as a <br />convenience. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a <br />variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-305 to allow reconstruction of a deck <br />approximately 8-inches taller than existing with new guard railings, 8.5-feet from the south <br />property line where a 12-foot setback is required; and Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow <br />reconstruction of a deck approximately 8-inches taller than existing, new guard railings, and a <br />reoriented staircase within the average lakeshore setback, subject to the following conditions: <br />4