Laserfiche WebLink
\5, Snbdlvisioa 6 B <br />ick: <br />id * 30' <br />id - 5* <br />Travelled ■ 40* <br />;e 25* or 83% <br />» • <br />k • <br />id <br />id <br />le <br />30' <br />25' <br />5' or 17% <br />tions: <br />irmlt application before <br />t a revised site plan <br />ih side of the building <br />;h property line. <br />the north and east lot <br />roperty and provide lovr <br />front/street area. <br />acia structure# not to <br />estroo# Anderlik and <br />vate driveway along the <br />:y road will be allowed. <br />structure or a major <br />City of Orono. <br />F' #*•* <br />m <br />pp1 <br />■'li. <br />r.‘ (. <br />u <br />cm OF ommo <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay^ MH 55323 <br />IOHIH6 FILE HO. 1306 <br />HOnCB OF PLAHHIHG COMMISSION ACTION <br />473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/28/88 <br />Timothy F. Keegan COFIBS TO: <br />Metropolitan Waste Control COTiission <br />Mears Park Centre, 230 East 5th St <br />St. Paul# HN 55101 <br />Jim Olson <br />Bonestroo# Anderlik 6 Assoc. <br />2335 W H%ry 36 <br />St. Paul# HM 55113 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATIOH: Conditional Use Permit <br />DATE OF NBETIH6: <br />Planning CcMmissi <br />7/18/88 VOTE: € For <br />inds the following: <br />0 Against <br />Tabled for reasons noted below <br />H0TB8 AHD SPECIAL COHDITICWS: ^ ^ <br />The Planning Commission tabled all action on the conditional use <br />permit for the MWCC seeking approval of construction of a building that <br />would contain a lift station/generator as part of the upgrading of the <br />existing Metro sewer lines# subject to the MWCC filing for the appropriate <br />subdivision application that would divide off the 2#880 s.f. parcel from <br />the existing 30,300 s.f. parcel. In a recent conversation with the MWCC# <br />staff was advised that the subdivision application would not be filed for <br />the upcoming meeting# but would make the deadline for the September 18# <br />1988 meeting. <br />Staff will re-schedule the conditional use permit at the same meeting <br />as the review of the subdivision application. It should be noted that the <br />Planning Commission did have some comments regarding the proposed use of <br />the property and would like the following items addressed by the MWCC* <br />1. Will there be noise# or any special odors emitting from this structure <br />and the proposed use? <br />3. <br />Pi^ovide landscaping — it was noted by the Planning Commission that all <br />the other lift stations and improvements with the original upgrading <br />plans provided landscaping. This application provided no such <br />landscaping and we request landscaping for the structure. <br />The building design has been questioned by the members of the Planning <br />Commission finding it not appropriate for the surrounding neighborhood <br />suggesting a re-design of roof and making the structure look more <br />residential rather than for public works type use. Note other similar <br />structures# possibly in Eden Prairie# that have been designed for <br />MWCC's use that would be more appropriate than the design plan of this <br />structure. <br />4. Parking area should be defined on site plan. <br />Please see that your information is submitted at least two weeks <br />before the scheduled meeting for the review of the subdivision applicat_on. <br />It is staff's hope to get a comprehensive action and approval on the part <br />of the Planning Commission at the September meeting. <br />Tim# please contact my office at your earliest convenience as I would <br />like to discuss the filing of the applications sometime w_thin the fourth <br />application since I commenced the review (473-7357). <br />« <br />■mi <br />Vi <br />Iv:■ .'rr:- <br />1. <br />k <br />■V; <br />Sept <br />Ms. <br />Buili <br />City <br />Post <br />Crysi <br />Subj: <br />This <br />7/28/ <br />1. <br />2. <br />3.