Laserfiche WebLink
m % <br />Zoning Pile #1343 <br />September 27« 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />b) Each lot has at least 300* of frontage on a public roadway or <br />on a private roadway pursuant to an easement between persons; <br />c) Not a flexible zoning application (i.e. does not require any <br />special or conditional use permits, variances or rezoning). <br />The proposed driveway easement is 50* in width and includes a cul**de*- <br />sac of 100* diameter, hence in a future subdivision, dedication of the <br />private road outlot would be coincident with this proposed driveway <br />easement. Note that the proposed driveway easement is centered on the <br />existing driveway. The Public Works Director has indicated that a <br />future division into 2*^acre lots would likely result in the developer <br />having to share in the costs of raising Orono Orchard Road 5* to 6* at <br />the private road access point. <br />Also note that the City will require during this current division that <br />the property owner quit-claim deed an easement for right-of- <br />way/drainage/utility purposes over the platted Orono Orchard Road (and <br />perhaps additional if that road is not within the defined corridor). <br />This property contains 19.2 acres of designated wetlands, as shown on <br />the attached wetlands air photo. Since the applicant is t this time <br />not proposing to plat the property into two acre building sites and <br />since the wetlands are protected through our existing wetland <br />ordinance, there would appear to be no real benefit to the City in <br />requiring that Flowage and Conservation Easements be granted until <br />this property is platted at its maximum denity. <br />The proposed dividing line between Parcels A & B will leave all <br />improvements associated with the existing house well within the <br />property boundaries. <br />I <br />“ f