Laserfiche WebLink
Y-I-. .^-i-^. :■ ^.t •'•■ 4/■• ■••• -^- <br />imlnistrator <br />:ouflcil <br />red <br />and is requesting a <br />his three one-acre <br />Id a house on each of <br />f September 8, 1988. <br />}plicant's original <br />•operty, a history of <br />[ditlonal pertinent <br />lake a recommendation <br />Planning Commission <br />nd approval of one <br />ty, for a density of <br />for the property is <br />ombinations so that <br />acre parcels, deny <br />le new building site <br />■r'i <br />Si-, <br />mi"mm f <br />■'Y <br />*.A <br />m-i: <br />1- <br />-.-uSU^ 1 <br />m ‘ ' * <br />f A • <br />■-% . ■ <br />’"•'y <br />t <br />v;. <br />1 <br />h ■ ■ <br />A]■£. Ja:4.% •• -■ ^-. V <br />Zoning File #990 <br />Septesiber 27, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />C) Same s above except attach the denied lot to the existing <br />residence property. <br />D) Same as above except leave the denied lot uncombined with <br />either the approviid acre or the existing house acre. <br />Please refer to the survey/sketch attached as Exhibit N/E of 5/19/87, <br />about 11 pages back in your packet. This indicates that the parcel with <br />the existing house is about 1.01 acre, the next vacant parcel to the west <br />is about .85 acre, and the western most parcel is about 1.04 acre in area. <br />The applicant has shown that technically there is room to provide for <br />septic systems within the property, however, the sites wr Id be quite <br />limited in potential for development with more than just a simple single <br />family residence. Staff is on record as suggesting that constructing <br />houses on each of the two vacant lots will not ultimately further Orono*s <br />attempt to keep municipal sewers out of the rural area. Past Councils have <br />given applicant at least some suggestion that two l^s acre parcels, i.e. <br />allowing one additional building site on the entire three acre property, <br />would be worthy of consideration. <br />Staff Re<tation - <br />Again, staff would ask that you review the packet of information <br />provided. If Planning Commission feels that a variance to allow one <br />additional building site on the three acre property is justified, staff <br />would recommend that a lot line rearrangement and combination take place so <br />that the existing residence and the new building site will each contain 1.5 <br />acres of land. Should Planning Commission recommend such an approval, <br />additional appropriate conditions include: <br />A. Payment of standard Park Pee at the time the building permit is <br />issued. <br />B. Access location for the new buildable lot shall be subject to City <br />approval. <br />C. The applicant shall file an application for a lot line <br />rearrangement, and this variance approval shall not take effect until <br />such time as the lot line rearrangement has been completed. <br />I <br />'' ■ <br />■ t-- <br />life <br />t <br />; 1 <br />u <br />mmi <br />cm OF osm <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, <br />TOs Ward F« <br />3405 Wi <br />Long La <br />TXFS OF APPI <br />lOLTE OF MBS1 <br />•it.#IHCIL ACTI <br />Counci 1 <br />Commission f <br />This it <br />October 3, 1 <br />will be the <br />Please <br />your repress: <br />If you ( <br />are availab <br />approval by