Laserfiche WebLink
LE NO. 1306 <br />3MMISSION ACTION <br />te of Notice: 7/28/8S <br />son <br />roo, Anderlik 6 Assoc. <br />Hwy 36 <br />ulr MN 55113 <br />Against <br />n the conditional use <br />Ion of a building that <br />E tne upgrading of the <br />Ing for the appropriate <br />2,880 s.f. parcel from <br />rsation with the MWCC# <br />would not be filed for <br />for the September 19, <br />nit at the same meeting <br />iould be noted that the <br />.ng the proposed use of <br />essed by the MWCC: <br />ing from this structure <br />Lng Commission that all <br />the original upgrading <br />ion provided no such <br />structure. <br />members of the Planning <br />urrounding neighborhood <br />\e structure look more <br />se. Note other similar <br />lave been designed for <br />the design plan of this <br />:ted at least two weeks <br />subdivision application, <br />ind approval on the part <br />n. <br />convenience as I would <br />itime wj^thin the fourth <br />:wo weeks of September <br />Lew of this specific <br />■j • • •• ‘'■ <br />m <br />i <br />wm.. <br />i <br />ft <br />-j*" ^ <br />u <br />’-L J <br />V:- <br />Mm-Wm m->«•\i'-•. ■ <br />Wiste <br />/iMean Mirk Centre, 230 East Fifth St <br />^btraLCommiss <br />I. str^.^ t <br />September 16, 1988 i <br />Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building 6 Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Post Office Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Re: Orono Interceotor <br />MWCC Project Number 85-67 <br />Subject: Conditional Use Permit and Plat Appllcatiofi <br />This letter is in response to the city's concerns as summarired in the <br />7/28/88 notice, zoning file No. 1306. <br />1. Will there be noise, or any special odors eiiiittlBg from this <br />structure and the proposed use? <br />There will be some noise from the facility when the generator <br />is operated in an emergency or when being exercised. We anti­ <br />cipate that this would happen about 1/2 hour per week. <br />We do not anticipate a problem with odors at this lift sta <br />tion. <br />2. Provide landscaping - it was noted by the Planning Commission <br />that all the other lift stations and improvements with the <br />original upgrading plans provided landscaping. This applica­ <br />tion provided no such landscaping and we request landscaping <br />for the structure. <br />Commission staff will work with the City on a landscaping <br />plan. <br />3. The building design has been questioned by the members of the <br />Planning Commission finding it not appropriate for the <br />surrounding neighborhood suggesting a re-design of roof and <br />making the structure look more residential rather than for <br />public works type use. Note other similar structures, <br />possibly in Eden Prairie, that have been designed for MWCC's <br />use that would be more appropriate than the design plan of <br />this structure. <br />The design and type of construction of the building was <br />decided during bi-weekly review meetings with the Commission <br />staff. The building has a brick facing and flat roof con­ <br />sistent with this type of facility. The facility has homes <br />to the east and north and a marina to the west. Because <br />there is a mix of building types, with the marina probably <br />dominating, a commaicial type building was designed. <br />v^ars <br />1938-1988 <br />C1 <br />m. <br />r <br />■i-' <br />ham. <br />•V <br />.%■ <br />Jeann <br />Page <br />MWCC <br />Septe <br />4. <br />Diann <br />this <br />will <br />Bones <br />Engin <br />Pleas <br />or CO <br />Since <br />"arol <br />Admin <br />Right <br />CliL:s <br />L78