10-03-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

m: resulting from strict l/ii»y^ compliance with Zoning t 150* (you must obtain ance A-603 Govt Center ressed to each of the s (use address labels Lations as required, ations) if any changes ich a separate list of Lication. ff. application. Please omplete if the above ication is complete. Date ormation required or pay all fees and/or .on, and certifies that the best of his/her Date plication and further ry staff, consultants, purposes of investiga- Date 5d - :es 25 days before the tings are held on the ent at all scheduled . If an applicant is rangements to have an :he Building & Zoning wm A m ... r : =v, V Yot Planning Cosmission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bemhardson Troes Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Dates September 30, 1988 Zoning File il September 30, Page 2 of 2 3. Note that front yai in this c long dri location ^Object #1342 David 6 Valerie Peterson, 1125 North Arm Drive Variance - Public Rearing Application Request for side setback variance to construct detached garage. Zoning District * LR*1B, 1 Acre Minimum Sewered Additions Subdivisi of an ac( hardcove: the Sid variance/ List of Bzhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Application Plat Map Property Owners List Neighbor Acknowledgement Forms Applicants' Hardcover Calculations Survey Selected Garage Plans Pertinent Facts - 1.This property is approximately 0.6 acres in area, and is not a lakeshore lot. Hardcover on the property is approximately 23%, with no anticipated change (250-500* zone). 2.Applicants are proposing to construct a 22'x34' (24'x36*??) detached garage over the existing driveway. They are proposing to construct that garage approximately 1' from the side property line from the southwest corner oj: the garage and 6.33' from the side property line at the east end of the garage. There are no trees or other amenities that prohibit che proposed garage from being constructed to meet the required 10' side setbacks, in staff's opinion. There are some topographical concerns, however, staff feels that there would be ample room to locate the garage in the existing driveway area without requiring a side setback variance. Discussion - This pros construct a ga garage may be ] property and the applicant Planning Commi apron force th The neigl applicants, h< property owners Staff has them to be cor] where 30% hard 23% hardcover. Staff Recoanmeni Staff wou. garage on this to allow const front line of Commission ask request for a If the Plannir justify grantd approval would