Laserfiche WebLink
•* ■« <br />) for the clean up of <br />^SI) facility located in <br />italled monitoring wells <br />id horizontal extent of <br />mm <br />m .j <br />■..-3 <br />Bm <br />msultants, Inc. (Delta) <br />87 and "Proposed Work <br />installed to remediate <br />t large diameter sump <br />ontaminated water will <br />impounds and then be <br />> 1 <br />m.. iFi ■*r’ <br />smediately west of the <br />d is located in the SW <br />lited States 3eological <br />m <br />no, Minnesota. The <br />initial phase of this <br />Solvent Contamination <br />i <br />was installed and an <br />4W-4D) and sampling <br />>88. Volatile organic <br />M <br />fi'i <br />■f. <br />■v.< <br />A <br />(VCXTs) were identified in monitoring weU MW-4D. The pr«ence of VOCs in MW-4 promote <br />installation of three additional wells proposed in the May 24 work plan. <br />a fl AgPinONAL FBOJECT RESULTS <br />3.1 General <br />Three additio f**> monitoring wells were installed during Juiw 1988 to further define the extent of VOC <br />contamination. The locations of the new wells (MW-10, MW-II. and MW-12) are shown in Figure 2 along <br />with the locations of previously installed wells. After installation, the new weUs were developed <br />i sampled.hill* <br />3.1 Soil Borines and Moaitorina Wglll <br />Three additional soil barings were advanced at the site and were completed as monitoring wells. The <br />well locations are shown in Figure 2. The subsurface geology of the site consists of <br />heterogeneous mixture of clay, silt, sand, and gravel The stratigraphy consists of silty clay with <br />intermittent medium to coarse grained sand lenses which are generally less than two feet in width. <br />The sand lenses do not appear to be laterally extensive. Complete lithologic boring logs for the <br />three soil borings are included in Appendix A. Borings MW-10 and MW-11 were each advanced to a depth <br />of 25 feet below the existing grade. Boring MW-12 was advanced to a depth of 55 feet below the <br />existing grade. <br />Each of the three bcrings were completed as monitoring wells. The wells are constructed of low <br />carbcn steel .isers with five foot stainless steel screens. Complete well construction details are <br />given u Appendix B. <br />3.3. Contaminant Conditions <br />3.3.1 Soil Contamliiatlon <br />Soil contamination was previously identified in the vicinity of MW-4 and MW-4D; therefore, the upper <br />21 feet of soil was not sampled during the instaUation of MW-12. Low contaminant concentrations, as <br />detected by the hNu photoionization meter, were detected in an interval between 23 and 35 feet below <br />the ground surface during the drilling of MW-12. A summary of hNu results for borings MW-10, MW-11, <br />and MW-12 is included in Table 1. lonizable gases were not detected in any of the samples after <br />opening the split-spoon. Headspace checks revealed some volatiles in borings MW-11 and MW-12. <br />However, the concentrations (Table 1) are at the lowest detection limit for the hNu which is <br />approximately one part per million. At these concentrations, interferences with water vapors are <br />common and the concentrations must be viewed in this context. <br />Intervals <br />31 <br />36 <br />41 <br />55 <br />Concent! <br />Sample c <br />Headspa< <br />clo.811