Laserfiche WebLink
. ^, 1 <br />I •.-. <br />id the timber <br />rour property., <br />icountered it and <br />:he lake shore <br />1 and the failure <br />(tone wall was <br />t south. I <br />>n. <br />r the proposed <br />ition with the <br />linnetonka, is <br />Bision. My <br />t relative to <br />leighbors, the <br />of vegetation <br />lore permit as <br />aits as listed <br />proposal. <br />i- <br />i. . - ■ <br />J:;- <br />"M <br />m <br />•: >'a <br />'?• .<1*” <br />:>'• <br />4 <br />MS <br />t wmmi <br />mm <br />■•P: : •. ■ • .;•• <br />R_'M&m <br />•iT <br />ra3a.„ . ■ --i- .:M -^r-.->1f."- ‘4 EtV-^••:V •%, <br />Mr. Lee P^ge Two 31 Aug S3 <br />LAKESHORE COMSTEOCTIOH PERMIT. <br />1 />Arfsinlv halts continued erosion and therefore has stabilised the <br />2. The «U. ere .leoally unaccepteble In their current state with no planting and are <br />not compatible with the banka on adjacent properties. walls* I <br />MCOmraDAnON: A planting prograa as a «ans to f “*'hiSBAJmcn reco«end the raising of the bed levels at the <br />base of the walls to visually decrease the site of the <br />walls as viewed from the lake. <br />3. I a. not willing to certify the stability of the wall proposal but offer the <br />following observations: <br />a. The design of the walls appear to »%«««• <br />earth anchors to capture the adjacent mss of earth. <br />s:"strirri:o'"ac« :s“^itrtSfs‘"whuh*riu^inc"^^^^^ t“e"st:buify!““'' <br />c. I feel there is inadequate protection of the base of the lower wall <br />from high level wave and water action. seoarator blanket and stone <br />I5Pr"arai^thrbaM ’of^thl “irr'-ai^s shown on the <br />accompanying drawings. <br />d. The backfill is reprted to be Msonry <br />should allow drainage fro« the earth mss the <br />RECOMMENDATION: Drain holes should be installed 1 <br />base of each wall. <br />a. The backfill should be compacted. -nmn-rt dav backfill to 12” fromRECOMMENDATION: Remove, reinstall and compact clay <br />top of the walls. <br />f. The base of the walls is 12” or less into the <br />opportunity for froot action and eventual heaving _ „-iig <br />^ RECOMMENDATION: Raise the grade at the base of the <br />4.ThA ^tair is twice the allowable width of 48” under Orono ordinances. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Plant materials should be allowed to grow over <br />stair. <br />Th. proposal does not meet the Uniform Building Code in at Uast 2 areas: <br />fl There is no rail protection from vertical changes over 30 height. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Raise the grade at the base of the wa ® <br />possible; install plantings as shown, install a <br />temporary rail at the top wall. <br />^^RECOMMENDATIONriSsLu a steel piperail. paint gray to match house <br />Vy <br />r>.'- <br />n <br />■? 1 <br />■ oi^:-■'M <br />► 4 <br />w <br />Hr. Lee <br />6. The proposal i <br />establishment of p <br />REC0^tfENDA <br />7« Restoration: <br />RECQMfENDA <br />Following successf <br />listed above, I fe <br />If you have any qu <br />Sincerely, <br />James Robin <br />••