My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988 Planning Packets
>
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 9:55:49 AM
Creation date
12/20/2023 10:40:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
457
PDF
View images
View plain text
Zoning Pile §1343 <br />September 27, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />««k % <br />b) Each lot has at least 300* of frontage on a public roadway or <br />on a private roadway pursuant to an easement between persons; <br />c) Not a flexible xoning application (i.e. does not require any <br />special or conditional use permits, variances or resoning). <br />The proposed driveway easement is 50* in width and includes a cul-de* <br />sac of 100* diameter, hence in a future subdivision, dedication of the <br />private road outlot would be coincident with this proposed driveway <br />easement. Note that the proposed driveway easement is centered on the <br />existing driveway. The Public Works Director has indicated that a <br />future division into 2-acre lots would likely result in the developer <br />having to share in the costs of raising Orono Orchard Road 5* to 6* at <br />the private road access point. <br />Also note that the City will require during this current division that <br />the property owner quit-claim deed an easement for right-of- <br />way/drainage/utility purposes over the platted Orono Orchard Road (and <br />perhaps additional if that road is not within the defined corridor). <br />This property contains 19.2 acres of designated wetlands, as sho%m on <br />the attached wetlands air photo. Since the applicant is t this time <br />not proposing to plat the property into two acre building sites and <br />since the wetlands are protected through our existing wetland <br />ordinance, there would appear to be no real benefit to the City in <br />requiring that Flowage and Conservation Easements be granted until <br />this property is platted at its maximum denlty. <br />The proposed dividing line between Parcels A & B will leave all <br />improvements associated with the existing house well within the <br />property boundaries. <br />I <br />MS: <br />m <br />-■ <br />^.1 <br />■m <br />m <br />Zoning Fj Septembez <br />Page 3 of <br />Discnssic <br />The <br />propert''' <br />situatio <br />private <br />easement <br />such that <br />have each <br />include <br />pilvate <br />easement <br />if a sin <br />subdivis <br />easement <br />zoning di <br />Staf <br />division <br />submittec <br />insure th <br />be constr' <br />As n> <br />areas. SI <br />required <br />either ot <br />Flowage a: <br />Staff Rec« <br />Base' <br />would rec <br />W.F. Rydel <br />not be re< <br />could be <br />the currer <br />the Park : <br />future suh <br />Si
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).