10-03-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rplaiP IT™!tKS!>!ffa*^:ir? -'r^ '!#?'■•p «. . ^■?t -: •j.'V-rif -vM■ *»r > '* ♦ i.< '• ■•a-** . rtt -*‘t>^»“ * ■, ..a j ■ ^ . . •. ■ .♦ -♦• »-. •. f ■■Ml*Af ,t fT*t- A%*t4 ;i; •!a. ■ .?*.. ■ ■ .-^r ‘ £;•*;.*;** ‘*'“T"' *■ ♦».«• - *-• T •• 4-- — '■^. • A ■ V •- * . ^.a *1. r- »• » • # - •^ • f . ..-^-.I; !«v-;. ..- t-' V Vr-^ F-f, •?• ••.-:'*.t:| :. t-t- ' ■ V.':y.v,--.V.-k ~ -i9 ■*•*■'-■ -•-•■■ ■^. ■«■ » ' • A .«. * • « ». - ,. a • •« nJl •*.';»— ,.«.•■ i ■ .«■- # ' . k. • - ••-•■ •■«• ^. , »• 4 % . * -4m>- :H4 .saJ**•N «- • •ww.tr-/<t-€i?GlTYofORON<»Tmil fH6o» Hu» *«i»rry»Hl May Mm flu fli«’ Auf^fA SA»*»v 0/ Lakt' .Ifinm^unktt a .Vkl;£i*M«nM.npal Ofru-r* October 26* 1981 ward Ferrell 3405 Watertown ROad Long Lake, MN S53S6 Dear Mr. Ferrell: j tiave received your re ent letter to the «'^ity concerning the lots you own on Watertown Road. First, lot me apologize for not having time to answer your questions sooner. As 1 understand the problem, you own three separate tax parcels, or lots, on Waterto%m Road. Your home is on the eastern parcel with the next two parcels being the open yard area west of your home. You now wish to sell one or both of the other parcels for another building site. We measure the parcel with your home as about .86 acre in area, the next parcel as .82 acre, and the western parcel as 1.04 acre, all exclusive of road right of way. This totals 2.72 acres. The zoning in your area since 1975 has required at least 2.0 acres of land for each house. This is because there is no City sewer available and each house must maintain its own septic system. Your three parcels together now comprise one conforming 1°^* Xf any of the parcels were to be sold off, none would meet the minimum lot area including the one with your home. Because these lots would be less than the minimum area required, the City would not issue permits for any new house, whether vou own the lota or if you sold one. There would be no basis for the City to grant a variance to the zoning area requirements. The only option would be a general area-wide rezoning tell you that such a prospect is very, very unlikely. I must I know this is not the answer you were looking for. Things do change as the years pass. If you wish to discuss it further. SL'iLUINGa fONIMU -47I 7JS7 \ss4ssi>«; ADMIMSIKATIONSHNAMCF -47J 7JS3 II BLIC WORKS •47J 7JJ1 r w-',4.;;1^*t- ^4- »l>~ » «4 .BT ■ IT'4*r*'yt♦ ^ 4 ,.* -H*. -r. •' . * A.. ■tr - *■' !'!5t f.-i- • yUtvc T > .1 * ^ * M* t ■7 « ■ •' ^ W y:V .v-v.-' - ' .. .'H • , :n' . \{j ". • -A* ■ w *<• '■* P • I .••9w «• . . n: .■ - . •;V/ 7« ,, 4/ ». , *u.i;.. r :-;V • •* 4 . V ,--7... V'T'.:! *V .. ^ ‘.y' * -V f,'. B r*-*»‘* KT'-**^* V’ *v /V A ' «i : -'.;iA . -4 9 ^ * " r C*zFt -'" ■:ward Ferrell rage 2you ere elway Administrator Sincerely, Aian'P. Olso: 'city Planner ce: City CO Walter Jeanne