Laserfiche WebLink
Ktor <br />Bting <br />tated that existing <br />ng minutes contains <br />I of existing lots , <br />iferred to in the <br />commonly owned but <br />uncovered a total <br />: here the dozen or <br />jest: <br />.5 acre; vacant-1.1 <br />,0 acre; vacant-1.0 <br />D.7 acre? vacant-1.2 <br />je-0.5 acre: vacant- <br />E Course-125 acres; <br />int-0.75 acres(only <br />reels: w/house-7.0 <br />cres. <br />•1.0 acre; vaeant-1.1 <br />se-1.4 acre; vacant- <br />file #990 Page 2 of 2 <br />I) 300 Sixth Ave. H.- 2-pluS parcels: w/house-100 ac.+; vacant <br />l.S acre. <br />J) 879 North Brown Road - 2 parcels; w/house-l.O acre? vacant- <br />2.6 acres. <br />K) 960 N. Willow Drive - 2 parcels: w/house-l.O acre? vacant^ <br />1.0 acre. <br />Ii) 320 Turnham Road — 2 parcels: w/house—1.7 acres? vacant—1.1 <br />acres. <br />M) 200 Bederwood Road - 4 parcels: w/house-0.9 acre? vacant - <br />0.6 acre; vacant - 1.1 acre; vacant - 1.0 acre. <br />These 13 cases can be broken down into a number of categories: <br />X. Total acreage of commonly-owned parcels is great enough to <br />yield conforming lots if lot lines are re-arranged: ArE^Prl. <br />2. Total acreage of commonly-owned parcels yields only enough <br />area for a single substandard lot with existing house: C^OrL. <br />3. Total acreage of commonly-owned parcels yields enough area <br />for a single conforming lot with house* but not enough additional <br />area for a second conforming lot: B*G*H*J*K,M (these are very <br />similar to Ferrell situation). <br />III. To help Council assess the impact of granting or^ denying the Ferrell <br />variances * consider the following figures: <br />— Number of existing developed lots in the unsewered residential <br />zones: 1*050 approximately <br />- Number of undeveloped* substandard sized lots* in sinSL^il. <br />separate ownership in unsewered zones: 15 identified <br />- Number of unsewered common ownership situations with a <br />realistic potential for requesting variances to lot area in order <br />to gain an additional building site: 22 identified (13 of these <br />shown as A-M attached) <br />- Within a 1/2 mile radius of the Ferrell properties (excluding <br />the 3 Stubbs Bay Study Area streets Tonka Avenue* Crestview <br />Avenue* Eastlake Street where sewer is contemplated) the existing <br />developed lot sizes are: <br />2.0 acre or larger - 39 <br />1.25 acre to 1.99 acre - 13 <br />.75 acre to 1.24 acre - 23 <br />Less than .75 acre - 11 <br />m <br />Mm <br />mM <br />!: • <br />l! <br />’ A, <br />^ I <br />To: <br />Frexa: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Atta. <br />Mr. Ferre: <br />The < <br />1. i <br />Ferr< <br />the <br />2. ■ <br />only <br />subs' <br />3. <br />addi <br />memb <br />f avo <br />the < <br />deni <br />raqu <br />appr< <br />1986 <br />be w. <br />comm <br />Staf: <br />requ <br />Comm. <br />Staf; <br />the resol <br />.t/o c-< L- 6? ■