Laserfiche WebLink
1 7,-= I <br />tor <br />ad - <br />ruct homed on two <br />to the existing <br />er Lot <br />; Lot <br />non-conforming, <br />»wer, aligned in a <br />ivate road or road <br />permitted without <br />I if the separation <br />s that satisfy the <br />anuary 1, 1975 in <br />Its of the Zoning <br />a single family <br />judgement of the <br />ilth or safety and <br />' Sewer. A lot of <br />public sanitary <br />he Zoning Chapter <br />Swelling purposes <br />>■ '.ateik'.* <br />* 1 * <br />..-•r-v; <br />.■ V <br />m <br />r;m <br />ll <br />A. <br />mm <br />Zoning Pile #990 <br />November 13, 1985 <br />page 2 of 5 <br />per subdivision 6. a -Lot of Record* is o"f‘^?heor registered land •-jey ha» recorded in the o«i.ce^o^^ <br />if required. <br />d..„is »vVdr.?£V;£z “" <br />w«te?ly^parc?l\^ «^!.oran^^^ respectively. The applicant <br />w"^es t^ oSwin building permits for each of the westerly parcels. <br />The 1950 zoning Code (adopted 7/10/50) established a <br />lfrr-11 reruns J^to <br />r..-.ir/K\ra <br />Vnc‘d^ing thi road right-ofr-ay would iid.ly <br />htve bten considered conforming or nearly conforming lots <br />the 1967 Zoning Code which designated the Pr°P®rty as Zone R 1 » <br />and 140* wlStS! Single Family Residential. That 1967 Code stated, re <br />garding lots of record, as follows: <br />*»! onn Kvistina Lots. A lot of record existing upon September 14, <br />1967 (the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single separa e <br />^ ^ District, which does not meet the <br />requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or the <br />for a single family detached dwelling purpose <br />judgment If the Council such use doeshealth or safety. Single separate ownership includes joint ownersnip <br />by not more than two persons. <br />The 1967 code did not discuss common °«n®''®bip properties nor did it <br />differentiate between sewered and types of <br />using the berm "Single Separate^ne^^^^^^^ i„t a^" n®b -Jefine in what way. <br />ownership would be treated different y allowed to build on <br />under this code, the applicant would likely have oeen aiio standards of <br />the 1.04 acre lot without a »®“®“®® because the lot met tne s« <br />the 1-acre zoning district. The 0.85 acre lot would li y . <br />Colnoil approval, depending on whether the area in the road right of way <br />was included in the lot area at that time. <br />\ xt <br />k. <br />1 <br />■W: <br />Zoning File <br />November 13 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The 15 <br />Single Fami <br />follows: <br />31.201 <br />(the <br />separa <br />i]quirem <br />a sine <br />m.ent c <br />or saf <br />31.201 <br />in ani <br />meet t <br />may bi <br />Counci <br />( <br />t <br />( <br />t <br />h <br />( <br />a <br />Under <br />lot area v <br />again did <br />commonly ov <br />of at leas <br />adjacent Ic <br />not be sep£ <br />the require <br />Upon z <br />following S <br />C. T1 <br />devel <br />contig <br />easeme <br />Counci <br />of sue <br />area a <br />r- 'TT <br />■•‘Vr <br />)■