Laserfiche WebLink
J;:: ^ -;t;.r:^imm^. 1 ■ <br />I lot containing 2.1 <br />a drainage easement <br />North Brown Road), <br />tem is not as shown <br />ound system located <br />from and at a much <br />: at all similar to <br />)ermit or granted a <br />ots in an unsewered <br />uest, if approved, <br />er substandard lots <br />ition. <br />nsewered lots to be <br />]uest to keep sewer <br />relation to codes <br />mber 13, 1985 for a <br />and how changes in <br />e met or nearly met <br />1959, the Council <br />ant variances for <br />ring that commonly <br />i, and inferred that <br />hat ordinance with <br />rariiy deprive the <br />3 of last meeting's <br />L.e. by stating that <br />substandard size <br />fare concerns were <br />»propriate for sub­ <br />minimum width, and <br />»s for unsewered <br />h, septic OK, meets <br />lying) that common- <br />lar application for <br />, establishing City <br />'m <br />• r' <br />MM <br />mi. <br />if:--- <br />iM-M <br />M <br />' '-ip’ k•M <br />h <br />hn <br />% ‘ <br />Zoning File #990 <br />May 29, 1987 <br />page 3 of 4 <br />.. ««-A«>ed that unsewered substandard! <br />^®®'.hr^'lot".“ciSlSTotTe separated from adjacent lots if the <br />=::?l\"rs"r*s!li5ta^“dVrd'Tot"in either case.•C ^ - - - - <br />Staff^lieve. that Parcel 2 <br />tL^'l *”e re"<^i "ement of the 1950 Zoning Code. <br />rcea ««w -- - - - -- - - - - <br />« 1 ^ been unbuildable without variances <br />Staff believes ^^*^.?*wf*\,ithout variances prior to 1/1/75. since 1/1/75, but was buildable witnout vat <br />^ ^ 1 ^ 9 m 1% As W <br />X/ J»/ 9^9 - - <br />Bach zoning Code «Jom Ordinance 22 adopt^ aSbs?and«d <br />r^^e’reriots^wtr^^-t =s"uh7t"a\d.1 <br />irs°ubs^nrr"d^?ndividull lots. <br />xr SUCH Cl -- - - - - -- - <br />d. 4r ^9 Ferrell’s ■loss* if he doesn’t get two new III. Regarding the extent of Fe <br />building sites. <br />staff believes that since an tha^^acrL’hf had'^e <br />2 undoubtedly not buildable due . 1^^^^laing lot (Parcel 3) from <br />buildability ^^^ht to /rom*l/l/75 to the present has buildability <br />Ferrell would have had the right to *.®“^*’*/w|4)'but"h^not arbiridarie lots) to other parties prior to 4/1/M^^^ buildable <br />them, and as of as separate lots without Cowc^ <br />without variances,and can t be soia o 4/1/84 and applied for <br />aoorovaL;. And even if he ^ad sold^ the^^ P^ 10/26/84, there would be no <br />variances, ®=“tding to Alan Olson granting the variances to the area <br />basis, hardship, or . en«<-ains would logically be related to a <br />requirement. Any "loss , staff suggests that, <br />taking of rights he has .d a‘lot «ea variance for Parcel 2 «hen his <br />that the City formally Mr Ferrell has never had -he 'ig“t to 2 <br />subdivision occurred in 1958 59, • ,2/31/74 had the right only to one <br />additional lots. */°“ ^°//“/|| to th® additional lot, and from 1/1/75 to tne p <br />the existing developed buxlding site. <br />Zoning Fill <br />May 29, 19# <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Staff <br />granted to <br />reviewed h <br />wording of <br />however, t <br />mention of <br />that the C: <br />recognized <br />1955 Code <br />the road r: <br />Staff Recoi <br />Attacl <br />Ferrell to <br />The O <br />1. A( <br />would <br />if he <br />2. T. <br />if th <br />evidi <br />and a <br />rehea <br />3. A <br />buil< <br />have <br />Counc <br />revis <br />but f <br />recos <br />Febru <br />would <br />commi <br />would <br />appl <br />revie <br />Staff <br />resolutioi <br />41. <br />advi <br />evid< <br />addil <br />c) <br />appl: <br />Counc