My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 9:55:49 AM
Creation date
12/20/2023 10:40:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
457
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fARCB 10, 1966 <br />that are involved in <br />tason this area was <br />as the problem with <br />lure on 1 acre lots, <br />lications have been <br />Lcil would be setting <br />ation is unique and <br />sms do not fail. <br />blems are showing up <br />iffron reviewed the <br />950 to present. He <br />en Anderson in 1981 <br />these cases. <br />o proof of setting a <br />iuse of the unique <br />it zoning code would <br />icre parcels, but he <br />upon the request of <br />the entire Council <br />decision on this <br />iincil has a moral <br />s' actions. <br />ied by CounciImember <br />intil the April 14, <br />ence of the entire <br />ined the request for <br />i home addition and <br />overs increases are <br />Bone; the proposal <br />1.8% in the 75-250' <br />for safety reasons, <br />d, so the proposed <br />I. <br />2 yi <br />â– OTBS OF THE REGULAR OROHO C008CXL iTIRG HELD APRIL 14, 1986 <br />FERRELL <br />TERTOWN ROAD <br />- SECOHD REVIEW <br />Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the <br />request for a lot width and lot area variance for two <br />rural properties on Watertown Road noting this was <br />previously reviewed by Council on March 10, 1986 which <br />at that time was tabled because the entire Council was <br />not present to review it. <br />Ward Ferrell was present for this matter and stated his <br />attorney unaware of this meeting and was unable to <br />attend due to a previous appointment. <br />Mayor Butler asked Mr. Ferrell if he wished to defer <br />this matter until the next Council meeting in order for <br />his attorney to be present. Mayor Butler informed him <br />that if this application is denied, he must wait six <br />months to reapply. <br />Mr. Ferrell stated that he would like to proceed with <br />his application and depending on the outcome will <br />consult with his attorney. He noted that he still <br />feels that he is entitled to build a house and sell cne <br />lot to help pay for his retirement home as long as he <br />has owned the land since 1948. Ferrell stated he <br />divided it because the Council asked him to in 1958, and <br />the Council accepted the four lots and that the present <br />Council has a moral obligation to honor what that <br />Council told him. <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffron updated CounciImembers <br />Grabek and Hammerel (who were absent ac the March 10th <br />meeting) that Mr. Ferrell was requestj :ig permission for <br />3 homes on a total of 2.9 acres in a two-acre zone. The <br />3 lots are commonly owned by Mr. Ferrell and consist of <br />1.01 acres (upon which Mr. Ferrell's present home is <br />located), 1.04 acres, and .85 acres respectively. He <br />noted that applicant has submitted soil testing and site <br />plans to indicate that both septic systems and houses <br />can be placed on each lot. He noted that the question <br />is whether this would set a precedent by granting <br />approval. <br />Mr. Ferrell noted that the "28 similar case" parcels <br />noted in staff's memo are less than two acres with the <br />exception of one and that none of these parcels have <br />been owned as long as he has owned his property. Mr. <br />Ferrell stated that he had planned to build a retirement <br />home on o le lot and sell the other lot for payment for <br />the house and retirement equity. He feels that the <br />financial hardship should be considered.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.