Laserfiche WebLink
lY IB, 1986 <br />cally concurr** <br />ember 18, 198S <br />property should <br />>ts. <br />lo requested him <br />:here would not <br />home, and that <br />(d that when the <br />2 acre zoning <br />Id not affect <br />swed the history <br />>0 to 1984. He <br />iteria required <br />Bed on the 1975 <br />ing a precedent <br />lots in common <br />a by Taylor, to <br />hey do not meet <br />n. Ayes 2, Nays <br />Goetten voted <br />is a difficult <br />nrould have met <br />ago. McDonald <br />f ownership by <br />deny. Goetten <br />d stated that 2 <br />y Goetten, to <br />>mmend approval <br />ding sites and <br />5 the applicant <br />^ill recommend <br />property, was <br />van Me line was <br />>pe. <br />ember 16, 1985 <br />he applicants <br />property from <br />-/ <br />2- <br />mm <br />ii 1C-^ Jam <br />■k: <br />Ii <br />Hm•'if li ex»HINOTBS OF THE REGULAR OROMO COUNCIL TING HELD fOOKm 10, 1986 . <br />#967 ft #968 Il^TROM continued <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator noted that the driveway <br />has been reviewed by staff and finds no problem with the <br />access location. He also noted the potential of a <br />future third lot which would create problems for the <br />applicant. <br />Mayor Butler stated that the resolution should note the <br />potential problems regarding future re-subdivision which <br />would require the relocation of the access to properties <br />off the private strec^t. <br />Mr. Idstrom stated he was not concerned with a third lot <br />at this time and would deal with that problem in the <br />future if it arose. <br />CounciImember Adams stated he ^;^und no problem with the <br />proposed subdivision of two ’ots only but would if there <br />were three. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Adams, seconded by <br />CounciImember Prahm, directing staff to draft a <br />resolution with the appropriate variance relating to the <br />frontage and specifying that this is approval of two <br />lots noting the future problems of a third lot, to be <br />presented before final approval at the March 24, 1986 <br />Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />LRD FERRELL <br />_ 411, 3415 HATERTONN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />Ward Ferrell was present for this matter along with his <br />attorney, Leroy Haglund. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a variances on two existing lots, which are in the 2 <br />acre zone and are substandard under the current code. <br />He stated that this was presented last May as a zoning <br />appeal. He noted that applicant has had septic site <br />testing done and has proposed acceptable primary and <br />alternate sites. <br />Mr. Haglund stated that applicant's dream was to build a <br />house on one of these lots and was platted as such many <br />years ago. He submitted a petition signed by the <br />neighbors stating they have no objections to this <br />proposal. He also submitted aerial photos to show that <br />the applicant's proposal would not be inconsistent with <br />the area. <br />t <br />3gS <br />w-t mk M <br />y ' i\ <br />i <br />s*t: <br />MINUTES or <br />#990 FERRELL co <br />II-■ fi <br />#1006 CHRIS ft DA <br />1710 SHADYWOOD R( <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #1935