Laserfiche WebLink
i.V- <br />28, 1985. PAGE ^ <br />.on should the applicant <br />Ling to consider a total <br />)uncilmeinber T. Adams <br />pretation of. the zoning <br />father A.W. Scherven. <br />Ffron stated that the <br />tory addition over the <br />the lake side of his <br />the applicant proposes <br />sposed deck does extend <br />fron stated that the <br />scause the applicant is <br />juest apartment for his <br />ted that applicant does <br />ut has agreed that the <br />i rented out. Gaffron <br />pprove the application <br />le guest apartment use: <br />i only; 2) apartment use <br />guest apartment may not <br />by staff yearly; 4) use <br />f four years. <br />:e entrance is proposed <br />:on noted that the main <br />once inside the main <br />nt and a door leading to <br />ed that the Council did <br />1 use permit which is <br />Lot is really too small <br />nts have tried to sell <br />Icherven stated that he <br />, and then they would be <br />rven confirmed that he <br />ncil wishes to place on <br />-XV:,■ : - <br />¥ <br />• •• <br />. 1 ‘ <br />MlWTBS OF TSM FLAllllIliG COHMISSXCMI MSETIHG SELO MOVBMBBR 18, 198S. 4 <br />#988 tTBS contimed <br />Tom Corson, 3241 Casco Circle, was present and stated that <br />the lot in question was not consistent with the other lots in <br />the area. He also stated that the existing garage on the lot <br />should be resK>ved whether the variance is granted or not. Mr. <br />Corson felt that the original variance should not have been <br />granted being this lot is only 54* in width. <br />Tim Hertes stated that they felt they would not have a problem <br />meeting the setbacks and hardcover requireme. ts. <br />Goetten stated that the entire Casco Point area is a high <br />intense residential area. She noted that the lot size was <br />consistent with the area although it would be one of the <br />smallest lots. <br />Tom Corson stated that they would be making a crowded <br />situation even sx>re crowded. He questioned the initial <br />intent of the ordinance requiring a IQO* lot width. <br />Chairman Callahan stated that the lot w^s intended to provide <br />a residence and the hardship is that there is no other <br />adjacent property available. <br />There were no more cosoaents from the public and the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Goetten, to recommend <br />renewal of the lot width and lot area variances noting that <br />the Issues (1-7 ) and Findings (1-19), prepared by staff, were <br />found to be sufficient. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 1. Kelley voted <br />nay stating it would be overbuilt for lot size. <br />§989 HESMBPIN COOHTT DEPT. OP TSANSPORTATIOK <br />HENDRICKSOM ACCESS <br />COHDITIORAL USE PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEALIRG 11:40 -11:50 <br />Hennepin County proposes dredging approximately a 20'xl26* <br />wide corridor, removing 4.5' of lake botton along the edge of <br />the Hendrickson boat ramp, and constructing a 126* long <br />seawall along the sides of the inplace boat ramp. <br />There were no persons present regarding this matter at this <br />time. <br />Planning Commission table this matter until the December <br />16th meeting. <br />( §990 l^hRD FERRELL <br />Va41d:^3415 HATERTOHM ROAD <br />VARIAHCB <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:29 - 9:37 <br />Applicant requests lot area/lot width variances to construct <br />homes on two substandard vacant commonly-owned lots adjacent <br />to the exisiting residence at 3405 Watertown Road. <br />2^ <br />mm <br />u':\ X- <br />' <11 I: <br />•'J- <br />il ;• •<. 1 <br />"T <br />i.-ri <br />^ j <br />WHUT <br />#990 <br />#991 W] <br />1535 Bt <br />CONDIT] <br />PUBLIC