My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 7422
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Crystal Bay Road
>
3359 Crystal Bay Road - 17-117-23-41-0025
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 7422
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 4:27:28 PM
Creation date
12/19/2023 4:27:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3359
Street Name
Crystal Bay
Street Type
Road
Address
3359 Crystal Bay Road
Document Type
Resolutions
Permit Number
LA23-000050
PIN
1711723410025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AWAT0 CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />t G~ NO. 7422 <br />4" <br />c sHO <br />setback and hardcover variances.The current hardcover is over the limit at 39.4%and the additional <br />hardcover needed to modernize the property will bring the total hardcover to 43.9%. The <br />construction of a new home is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the <br />practical difficulties of the substandard lot size, substandard lot width, and existing conditions <br />present. This criterion is met. <br />2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive <br />plan." The variances resulting in a new single-family home is consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan.The applicant has identified the necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting <br />their requests. This criterion is met. <br />3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,'as used in connection with <br />the granting of a variance,means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The construction of a new single-family is a reasonable use of the property. The proposed <br />home will be located in a similar location to the existing home on the property. This <br />criterion is met. <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br />landowner. <br />The existing house was not built by the current owners. The lot is substandard in area and <br />width. The applicant is proposing to maintain a similar lake setback while adhering to the <br />average lakeshore setback. The small lot size, substandard width, and existing <br />improvements,such as Crystal Bay Road,are not the result of the current property owner's <br />actions; and <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br />The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a new home are supported by <br />practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. The neighborhood along <br />Crystal Bay Road is redeveloping and many of the properties require variances. The <br />proposed home is in line with the neighboring homes along the street.This criterion is met. <br />4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations <br />have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.