My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
05-10-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:39:21 AM
Creation date
12/18/2023 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO: <br />DATE: <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members <br />Ron Moorse <br />FROM: Stephen Weekman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />keim <br />may 1 0 1993 <br />OIYOFOMM <br />May 3, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: #1806 John and Shirley Billigineier. 2935 Farview Lane - Variances <br />t1. -OnUnai <br />Seetkm 10.03, Subd. 14 (D) • Setbacks for accessory structures. A tennis court 60’xl20 ’ <br />to be located within front yard and to be placed in front of the principal structure. <br />A. Front setback variance <br />Retpiired » 50’ <br />Proposed « 17’ <br />Variance * 33 ’ or 60% <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) <br />A. Stiuenire is also located 33 ’ in front of the principal structure requiring variance <br />approval. <br />Dcacriptioo of Request <br />The propose the installation of a 60’xl20 ’ tennis court to be kx^ in the <br />northwest comer of the property. This structure will be located 17’ frorn the street side lot line, <br />33 ’ from the west side lot line, and will also be placed in from of the principal structure located <br />at die required 50’ setback. 1 tennis court behind the from line of the principal structure <br />would require extensive land alteration and tree removal which would severely reduce the buffer <br />between the applicants' home and the residence to the immediate south. <br />The variance, if approved, would be the first request for a non-lakeshote lot owner or <br />lakeshore lot owner to insuU an accessory stnicture within the street yard. The proposed <br />improvemern does not appear to be consu'ent with the current pattern of developrnem within the <br />Farview neighborhood. <br />Due the proximity of the proposed tennis court to the alternate drainfield site, the <br />applicants were asked to provide additional soil testing information to im^te that the 20’ <br />required setback could be maintained. Soil testing has been supplied which indicates a trench <br />' •ji'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.