My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
05-10-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:39:21 AM
Creation date
12/18/2023 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o o <br />k* !j.«^ !^-‘ \ 4*•❖.'J^j-aKo <br />VesbO^^ <br />CITYofORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. :^979 <br />A RBSOLUTIOM GRANTING <br />A RSNBNAL VARIANCE TO <br />municipal zoning code <br />SECTION 10.23f SUBDIVISION 6 (B) <br />FILE #1648 <br />NBEREA8, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter "t|j® <br />applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 <br />Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and <br />legally described as follows: <br />Per Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WBERBASr the applicants have applied to the City for a <br />renewal of a variance granted in 1989 per Resolution #2650 and <br />previously renewed in 1990 per Resolution #2829 to Municipal <br />Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to perroxt the <br />construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined <br />width 30* where a defined lot width of 200' is normally required. <br />NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1648. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this <br />application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval <br />of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: <br />A) The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable <br />acre requirement. <br />B) A feasible building envelope exists in addition to <br />primary and alternate drainfield sites which have een <br />tested and approved for use. <br />C) The hardship to the property lies its extreme <br />narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is <br />measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land <br />available for purchase that would increase the defined <br />lot width to the 200’ minimum standard. <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.