Laserfiche WebLink
HINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MAY 10, 1993 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />J«ftr«y Johnson suggested since the Council will be appointing new <br />members, this would be an opportune time to establish a joint <br />session with the Planning Commission. <br />Mayor Callahan thanked him for his past service. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no comments. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPOPT <br />(#4) 91806 JON & SHIRLEY BILLIGMEIER, <br />2935 FARVIEW LANE - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION 93272 <br />Mr. and Mrs. BiI Iigmeier were present. <br />Mabusth explained the applicants seek a setback variance ® <br />oroposed accessory structure (tennis court) which Is required to <br />be placed behind the front line of the existing residence and <br />maintain a 60* setback. The tennis court Is proposed at a 17 <br />setback because It the structure was moved to the south, the <br />topography Is very steep and several mature trees would have to be <br />removed that now provide a natural buffer. <br />meet the required side setback of 30’. Approval is conditioned upon <br />the septic system being staked prior to construct Ion. There will <br />be a 6* high retaining wall to support the base of the tennis <br />court. <br />Goetten questioned whether the setback from the septic system could <br />be met. <br />Mabusth stated the tennis court will meet the 20’ **^^J®*^ JJJ <br />septic system and that is why the retaining wall Is to be Installed <br />to allow for drainage to flow away from the septic system. <br />Goetten clarified that the only real concern is the placement of <br />the tennis court In the front yard. <br />Mabusth noted In the entire development. It®. nlTurl?accessory structure placed In the front yard, but with the natural <br />Jc^Je^ng In the area and the curve of the road, tennis court <br />will not be that noticeable. She noted several of the neighbors <br />appeared at the Planning Commission meeting In support OT the <br />project.