Laserfiche WebLink
il: <br />private road <br />tmepin County <br />inty Road 19# <br />s 100* right- <br />county Roads <br />Itlot A, with <br />property can <br />B - Designate <br />n. of at least <br />in the plat <br />t 2 that any <br />:t to access <br />Ly have to be <br />constructed. <br />less interior <br />er the wetland <br />Sasenents along <br />B4, per current <br />—^ ^ n - ■ - Mg..-SlESf, —,-- r------------------.....aajjtefcJBMaBliltfn -IWWjKT- I” - ■» <br />bM. a - -• <br />^ -#r-sa. <br />XOHV6 PILE lO. 1301 <br />cm OP OROHO EOnCB OP PLAmiMG COMMISSKRI ACTZOR <br />P.O. Box 66 - , , iCrystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/ <br />to* David 6 Fredrick White COPIES TO* Marvin G. Lovlein <br />14195 Pauls Drive 6025 Abbott Ave N <br />Rogers, MN 55374 Brooklyn Center, MN <br />tXPE OP APPLICATIOHs Subdivision <br />DATE OP NEETIEGs 7/18/88 VOTE* 6 For 0 Against <br />Planning CoHaission reoosawnds the followings <br />Tabled for reasons noted below <br />NOTES AMD SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />1. Planning Commission requested that the applicant work with neigh <br />property owners to consider a logical, comprehensive developmen <br />for the area, in order that future road needs can be addressed. <br />2# Planning Commission felt that a topographical map of the < <br />property is necessary in order to determine future develi <br />potential given this division of one parcel into three parcels. <br />3, Planning Commission requested that staff investigate the City's <br />regarding development of the anticipated road connection between <br />Arm Lane and County Road 19; i.e. Would it be public or private <br />was a through road? Who would build it? Who would pay the cost <br />Planning Commission was unable to take formal action on your r <br />to reconsider division of just the house and three acres from the <br />parcel, because the application had been tabled until August 15th a <br />interested members of the public had left. However, Planning Comm <br />did suggest that a topographical map would likely not be required <br />division to split off just the house, but that they would likely con <br />approval upon dedication of a portion of future roadway at the sou' <br />quadrant of the property, and require that any future division < <br />remaining large parcel be required to access from internally pr< <br />roadways, not directly to County Road 19. It would appear feasible t <br />an interior road serving the entire northerly remaining parcel, so t <br />most only 1 new access point is created on County Roads 84 and 19. <br />Staff would support approval of the one lot division witl <br />topographical survey based on the conditions noted above. Staff <br />suggest a reconfiguration of the north boundary line as shown < <br />attached conceptual map. <br />>?■ : : <br />m <br />m m\ <br />% <br />B *\ <br />11 <br />p* ^m <br />Zoning Pile %12 <br />Notice of Planr <br />July 21, 1988 <br />Pege 2 of 2 <br />In order ^ <br />soon as posslt <br />three lot pla <br />topographic sui <br />three acres wii <br />to discuss the <br />It would be ap] <br />meeting. <br />The next <br />1988. In ords <br />contact staff <br />proceed. Stafj <br />will be prepar <br />Planning Commi <br />owners to dev< <br />staff's opinioi <br />planning, hen< <br />owners to veri <br />If the ap <br />contact the Zo <br />If you de <br />minutes, they <br />approval by th